Chen‐Yang Jia
Impact in
-
- Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Synthesis and biological activity
- Synthesis and Biological Evaluation
- Click Chemistry and Applications
Papers in
-
- Computational Drug Discovery Methods 6
- Co-authors
- Guang‐Fu Yang (10 shared papers)Ge‐Fei Hao (9 shared papers)Jingyi Li (1 shared paper)Fan Wang (5 shared papers)Xing-Xing Shi (2 shared papers)Jing‐Fang Yang (4 shared papers)Mengyao Wang (3 shared papers)Fengxu Wu (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Briefings in Bioinformatics (2 papers)European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry (1 paper)Pest Management Science (1 paper)Drug Discovery Today (1 paper)Current Medicinal Chemistry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- ChinaMontenegroUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Chen‐Yang Jia
12 papers receiving 850 citations
Chen‐Yang Jia's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 281
- Organic Chemistry 256
- Pharmacology 77
- Toxicology 29
- Insect Science 75
Countries citing papers authored by Chen‐Yang Jia
This map shows the geographic impact of Chen‐Yang Jia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chen‐Yang Jia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chen‐Yang Jia more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chen‐Yang Jia
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chen‐Yang Jia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chen‐Yang Jia. The network helps show where Chen‐Yang Jia may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chen‐Yang Jia, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A drug-likeness toolbox facilitates ADMET study in drug discovery Hit paper breakdown → | 2019 | 362 |
| 2 | 2020 | 106 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 81 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 70 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 57 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 52 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 37 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 35 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 25 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 19 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 8 |
About Chen‐Yang Jia
Chen‐Yang Jia is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Organic Chemistry and Toxicology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 866 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (6 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (2 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (2 papers), Synthesis and biological activity (2 papers), Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents (2 papers), Data Stream Mining Techniques (1 paper), Plant Molecular Biology Research (1 paper) and Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (281 citations), Organic Chemistry (256 citations), Pharmacology (77 citations), Toxicology (29 citations) and Insect Science (75 citations). Chen‐Yang Jia has collaborated with scholars based in China, Montenegro and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Guang‐Fu Yang, Ge‐Fei Hao, Jingyi Li, Fan Wang, Xing-Xing Shi, Jing‐Fang Yang, Mengyao Wang, Fengxu Wu, Ming‐Zhi Zhang and Weihua Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Briefings in Bioinformatics, European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Pest Management Science, Drug Discovery Today and Current Medicinal Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.