Cheng Jin

1.6k citations
34 papers · 944 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Cheng Jin

31 papers receiving 929 citations

Peers

Cheng Jin
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Health Informatics 99
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 481
  • Hepatology 72
  • Health Information Management 29
  • Artificial Intelligence 192
Replace Qingxia Wu with:
Qingxia Wu China
Lise Wei United States
Benoît Schmauch France
Charlie Saillard France
Isabel Schobert Germany
Carlotta Masciocchi Italy
Fadila Zerka Netherlands
Vishwa S. Parekh United States
Cheng Jin relative to Qingxia Wu China Qingxia Wu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Qingxia Wu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cheng Jin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cheng Jin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheng Jin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheng Jin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cheng Jin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheng Jin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheng Jin. The network helps show where Cheng Jin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cheng Jin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cheng Jin Line = papers co-authored together Cheng Jin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020347
2 2021142
3 202254
4 202052
5 201951
6 202049
7 202038
8 201621
9 202118
10 202218
11 202116
12 202516
13 202014
14 202113
15 202311
16 202011
17 202111
18 201910
19 202210
20 20217

About Cheng Jin

Cheng Jin is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biomedical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 34 papers that have together received 944 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (8 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (3 papers), Carbon and Quantum Dots Applications (3 papers), COVID-19 diagnosis using AI (3 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (3 papers), AI in cancer detection (2 papers), Brain Tumor Detection and Classification (2 papers) and Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (99 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (481 citations), Hepatology (72 citations), Health Information Management (29 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (192 citations). Cheng Jin has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Lei Deng, Weixiang Chen, Jie Zhou, Zimeng Tan, Zhanwei Xu, Xin Zhang, Chuansheng Zheng, Jianjiang Feng, Yukun Cao and Heshui Shi. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Frontiers in Oncology, European Journal of Radiology, Medical Physics and Clinical & Experimental Metastasis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact