Chen‐Chi Liu

543 citations
15 papers · 399 · h-index 10

Impact in

    • Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
    • Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
    • Cancer Cells and Metastasis

Papers in

Chen‐Chi Liu

15 papers receiving 395 citations

Peers

Chen‐Chi Liu
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Cancer Research 97
  • Oncology 119
  • Emergency Medicine 35
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 97
  • Molecular Biology 191
Replace Seiji Ogata with:
Seiji Ogata Japan
Ying Q. Lin China
Takuto Shimizu Japan
D. P. S. SANDHU United Kingdom
Eli Kakiashvili Israel
Yesenia Rojas United States
John J. Murray United States
Iryna Samarska Netherlands
Valerie C. Amann Switzerland
Hongfa Yang China
Chen‐Chi Liu relative to Seiji Ogata Japan Seiji Ogata's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.6×
Seiji Ogata · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chen‐Chi Liu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chen‐Chi Liu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chen‐Chi Liu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chen‐Chi Liu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chen‐Chi Liu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chen‐Chi Liu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chen‐Chi Liu. The network helps show where Chen‐Chi Liu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chen‐Chi Liu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chen‐Chi Liu Line = papers co-authored together Chen‐Chi Liu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2014136
2 201941
3 201641
4 200937
5 202132
6 201328
7 201919
8 202215
9 201112
10 201112
11 20249
12 20147
13 20124
14 20144
15 20062

About Chen‐Chi Liu

Chen‐Chi Liu is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Oncology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 15 papers that have together received 399 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer Cells and Metastasis (3 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (3 papers), Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (2 papers), Abdominal Trauma and Injuries (2 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (2 papers), Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments (2 papers), Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis (2 papers) and Urological Disorders and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (97 citations), Oncology (119 citations), Emergency Medicine (35 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (97 citations) and Molecular Biology (191 citations). Chen‐Chi Liu has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Han‐Shui Hsu, Shih‐Chieh Hung, Tien‐Wei Hsu, Jiun‐Han Lin, Kelly Su, Anna Fen‐Yau Li, Jiun-Han Lin, Kun‐Ta Chou, Jer-Wei Chang and Chien‐Ying Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, International Journal of Cancer, Scientific Reports, Biomolecules and Injury.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact