Charlotte Nettekoven
- Neurology top 1%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Rehabilitation top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Co-authors
- Christian GrefkesAnne K. RehmeSimon B. EickhoffLukas J. VolzGereon R. FinkEva‐Maria PoolCarolin Weiß LucasRoland Goldbrunner
- Topics
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (12 papers)Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (10 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Charlotte Nettekoven
20 papers receiving 843 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Neurology 618
- Cognitive Neuroscience 473
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 252
- Rehabilitation 147
- Biomedical Engineering 116
Countries citing papers authored by Charlotte Nettekoven
This map shows the geographic impact of Charlotte Nettekoven's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charlotte Nettekoven with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charlotte Nettekoven more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charlotte Nettekoven
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charlotte Nettekoven. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charlotte Nettekoven. The network helps show where Charlotte Nettekoven may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charlotte Nettekoven
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charlotte Nettekoven. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charlotte Nettekoven based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charlotte Nettekoven. Charlotte Nettekoven is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 22 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 20 | |
| 12 | 114 | |
| 13 | 43 | |
| 14 | 57 | |
| 15 | 125 | |
| 16 | 199 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 88 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 113 |
About Charlotte Nettekoven
Charlotte Nettekoven is a scholar working on Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 20 papers that have together received 848 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (12 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (10 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (618 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (473 citations) and Rehabilitation (147 citations). Charlotte Nettekoven has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Christian Grefkes, Anne K. Rehme, Simon B. Eickhoff, Lukas J. Volz, Gereon R. Fink, Eva‐Maria Pool, Carolin Weiß Lucas, Roland Goldbrunner, Jochen Michely and Volker Neuschmelting. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, NeuroImage and The Journal of Physiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.