Charlotte Decock

1.8k total citations
32 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Charlotte Decock is a scholar working on Soil Science, Plant Science and Environmental Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Charlotte Decock has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Soil Science, 13 papers in Plant Science and 10 papers in Environmental Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Charlotte Decock's work include Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (19 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (10 papers) and Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry (9 papers). Charlotte Decock is often cited by papers focused on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (19 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (10 papers) and Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry (9 papers). Charlotte Decock collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Germany. Charlotte Decock's co-authors include Johan Six, Cristina Lazcano, Xia Zhu‐Barker, Joachim Mohn, Eliza Harris, Benjamin Wolf, Dominika Lewicka‐Szczebak, Tobias Denk, Klaus Butterbach‐Bahl and Ralf Kiese and has published in prestigious journals such as Environmental Science & Technology, The Science of The Total Environment and Soil Biology and Biochemistry.

In The Last Decade

Charlotte Decock

31 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Charlotte Decock

ECOLO

Seiichi Nishimura Japan

Chunyan Liu China

Francisco Matus Chile

G.X. Xing China

M. I. Khalil Ireland

Cordula Vogel Germany

Déborah Pinheiro Dick Brazil

Robert Edis Australia

E. R. Dixon United Kingdom

R. Russow Germany

Seiichi Nishimura Japan

Charlotte Decock

841 ×1.2

427 ×1.1

355 ×0.9

ECOLO

371 ×1.2

132 ×0.6

Citations per year, relative to Charlotte Decock Charlotte Decock (= 1×) peers Seiichi Nishimura

Countries citing papers authored by Charlotte Decock

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charlotte Decock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charlotte Decock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charlotte Decock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charlotte Decock

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charlotte Decock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charlotte Decock. The network helps show where Charlotte Decock may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charlotte Decock

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charlotte Decock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charlotte Decock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charlotte Decock. Charlotte Decock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Steenwerth, Kerri L., et al.. (2025). On‐Farm Assessment of Long‐Term Impacts of Regenerative Management on Vineyard Soil Health. European Journal of Soil Science. 76(5).

Malama, Bwalya, et al.. (2023). Short-term effects of increasing compost application rates on soil C and greenhouse gas (N2O and CO2) emissions in a California central coast vineyard. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 11. 14 indexed citations

Lazcano, Cristina, et al.. (2022). Assessing the Short-Term Effects of No-Till on Crop Yield, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Soil C and N Pools in a Cover-Cropped, Biodynamic Mediterranean Vineyard. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research. 2022. 1–12. 6 indexed citations

Malama, Bwalya, et al.. (2022). Short-Term Effects of Increasing Compost Application Rates on Soil C and Greenhouse Gas (N2o and Co2) Emissions in a California Central Coast Vineyard. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

Lazcano, Cristina, Xia Zhu‐Barker, & Charlotte Decock. (2021). Effects of Organic Fertilizers on the Soil Microorganisms Responsible for N2O Emissions: A Review. Microorganisms. 9(5). 983–983. 134 indexed citations

Merbold, Lutz, Charlotte Decock, Werner Eugster, et al.. (2021). Are there memory effects on greenhouse gas emissions (CO ₂ , N ₂ O and CH ₄ ) following grassland restoration?. Biogeosciences. 18(4). 1481–1498. 12 indexed citations

Broek, Marijn Van de, Shiva Ghiasi, Charlotte Decock, et al.. (2020). The soil organic carbon stabilization potential of old and new wheat cultivars: a ¹³ CO ₂ -labeling study. Biogeosciences. 17(11). 2971–2986. 18 indexed citations

Verhoeven, Elizabeth, Matti Barthel, Longfei Yu, et al.. (2019). Early season N ₂ O emissions under variable water management in rice systems: source-partitioning emissions using isotope ratios along a depth profile. Biogeosciences. 16(2). 383–408. 37 indexed citations

Eyhorn, Frank, Marrit van den Berg, Charlotte Decock, Harro Maat, & Ashish Kumar Srivastava. (2018). Does Organic Farming Provide a Viable Alternative for Smallholder Rice Farmers in India?. Sustainability. 10(12). 4424–4424. 23 indexed citations

10.

Decock, Charlotte, Gina Garland, Emma C. Suddick, & Johan Six. (2017). Season and location–specific nitrous oxide emissions in an almond orchard in California. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems. 107(2). 139–155. 15 indexed citations

11.

Wolf, Benjamin, Lutz Merbold, Charlotte Decock, et al.. (2015). First on-line isotopic characterization of N ₂ O emitted from intensively managed grassland. 3 indexed citations

12.

Wolf, Benjamin, Lutz Merbold, Charlotte Decock, et al.. (2015). First on-line isotopic characterization of N ₂ O above intensively managed grassland. Biogeosciences. 12(8). 2517–2531. 45 indexed citations

13.

Decock, Charlotte, Juhwan Lee, Magdalena Necpálová, et al.. (2015). Mitigating N ₂ O emissions from soil: from patching leaks to transformative action. SOIL. 1(2). 687–694. 72 indexed citations

14.

Decock, Charlotte. (2014). Mitigating Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Corn Cropping Systems in the Midwestern U.S.: Potential and Data Gaps. Environmental Science & Technology. 48(8). 4247–4256. 95 indexed citations

15.

Decock, Charlotte & Johan Six. (2013). On the potential of δ ¹⁸ O and δ ¹⁵ N to assess N ₂ O reduction to N ₂ in soil. European Journal of Soil Science. 64(5). 610–620. 13 indexed citations

16.

Decock, Charlotte, et al.. (2013). Assessing drivers of N2O production in California tomato cropping systems. The Science of The Total Environment. 465. 36–47. 15 indexed citations

17.

Decock, Charlotte & Johan Six. (2013). How reliable is the intramolecular distribution of 15N in N2O to source partition N2O emitted from soil?. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 65. 114–127. 110 indexed citations

18.

Decock, Charlotte, Haegeun Chung, Rodney T. Venterea, & Johan Six. (2011). Elevated CO2 and O3 modify N turnover rates, but not N2O emissions. AGUFM. 2011. 1 indexed citations

19.

Decock, Charlotte & Johan Six. (2011). Effects of elevated CO2 and O3 on N-cycling and N2O emissions: a short-term laboratory assessment. Plant and Soil. 351(1-2). 277–292. 15 indexed citations

20.

Decock, Charlotte, Karolien Denef, Samuel Bodé, Johan Six, & Pascal Boeckx. (2009). Critical assessment of the applicability of gas chromatography‐combustion‐isotope ratio mass spectrometry to determine amino sugar dynamics in soil. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. 23(8). 1201–1211. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact