Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Using AUC and accuracy in evaluating learning algorithms
20051.5k citationsCharles X. Ling et al.IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineeringprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Charles X. Ling
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles X. Ling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles X. Ling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles X. Ling more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles X. Ling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles X. Ling. The network helps show where Charles X. Ling may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles X. Ling
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles X. Ling.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles X. Ling based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Charles X. Ling. Charles X. Ling is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Li, Xiang, et al.. (2017). Triply Stochastic Gradients on Multiple Kernel Learning.. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence.8 indexed citations
10.
Gu, Bin & Charles X. Ling. (2015). A New Generalized Error Path Algorithm for Model Selection. International Conference on Machine Learning. 2549–2558.12 indexed citations
11.
Li, Xiang, Huaimin Wang, Bin Gu, & Charles X. Ling. (2015). Data sparseness in linear SVM. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 3628–3634.8 indexed citations
Ling, Charles X., et al.. (2003). Decision tree with better ranking. International Conference on Machine Learning. 480–487.36 indexed citations
16.
Zhang, Huajie & Charles X. Ling. (2001). Learnability of Augmented Naive Bayes in Nonimal Domains. International Conference on Machine Learning. 617–623.4 indexed citations
17.
Ling, Charles X. & LI Cheng-hui. (1998). Data mining for direct marketing: problems and solutions. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 73–79.443 indexed citations
18.
Ling, Charles X. & Handong Wang. (1997). Alignment algorithms for learning to read aloud. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 874–879.2 indexed citations
19.
Ling, Charles X., et al.. (1993). A Symbolic Model for Learning the Past-Tenses of English Verbs.. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 1143–1149.3 indexed citations
20.
Ling, Charles X., et al.. (1993). Constructive Inductive Logic Programming.. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 1030–1036.12 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.