Charles Richter

1.6k total citations
12 papers, 503 citations indexed

About

Charles Richter is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. According to data from OpenAlex, Charles Richter has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 503 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 3 papers in Information Systems and 2 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Recurrent topics in Charles Richter's work include Software Engineering Research (3 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (3 papers) and Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (2 papers). Charles Richter is often cited by papers focused on Software Engineering Research (3 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (3 papers) and Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (2 papers). Charles Richter collaborates with scholars based in United States. Charles Richter's co-authors include Colin Potts, Nicholas Roy, Mitchell D. Lubars, Hod Lipson, Nicholas Roy, Adam Bry, Abraham Bachrach, V. Y. Shen, Dallas Webster and Frank G. Halasz and has published in prestigious journals such as The International Journal of Robotics Research, Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing and Artificial Life.

In The Last Decade

Charles Richter

12 papers receiving 453 citations

Peers

Charles Richter

AI

IS

AE

CVPR

CSE

Ranbir Singh Batth India

Mike Phillips United States

Wee Sun Lee Singapore

Seunghun Jin South Korea

Alexander Ferrein Germany

Ulrik Pagh Schultz Denmark

Eric T. Matson United States

Zoltán Vámossy Hungary

Liangyi Gong China

Victor Bahl United States

Ranbir Singh Batth India

Charles Richter

117 ×0.7

AI

171 ×1.0

IS

71 ×0.4

AE

92 ×0.7

CVPR

53 ×0.6

CSE

Citations per year, relative to Charles Richter Charles Richter (= 1×) peers Ranbir Singh Batth

Countries citing papers authored by Charles Richter

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Richter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Richter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Richter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Richter

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Richter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Richter. The network helps show where Charles Richter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles Richter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles Richter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles Richter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charles Richter. Charles Richter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

12 of 12 papers shown

1.

Richter, Charles & Nicholas Roy. (2017). Safe Visual Navigation via Deep Learning and Novelty Detection. 100 indexed citations

2.

Richter, Charles & Nicholas Roy. (2015). Towards high-speed autonomous navigation of unknown environments. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9467. 94671P–94671P. 1 indexed citations

3.

Bry, Adam, Charles Richter, Abraham Bachrach, & Nicholas Roy. (2015). Aggressive flight of fixed-wing and quadrotor aircraft in dense indoor environments. The International Journal of Robotics Research. 34(7). 969–1002. 109 indexed citations

4.

Richter, Charles & Hod Lipson. (2011). Untethered Hovering Flapping Flight of a 3D-Printed Mechanical Insect. Artificial Life. 17(2). 73–86. 82 indexed citations

5.

Lubars, Mitchell D., Colin Potts, & Charles Richter. (2002). A review of the state of the practice in requirements modeling. 2–14. 120 indexed citations

6.

Richter, Charles. (1999). Designing Flexible Object-Oriented Systems with UML. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 24 indexed citations

7.

Lubars, Mitchell D., Colin Potts, & Charles Richter. (1993). Developing initial OOA models. International Conference on Software Engineering. 255–264. 23 indexed citations

8.

Lubars, Mitchell D., et al.. (1992). Object-oriented analysis for evolving systems. 173–185. 14 indexed citations

9.

Shen, V. Y., et al.. (1990). VERDI: A visual environment for designing distributed systems. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing. 9(2). 128–137. 14 indexed citations

10.

Biggerstaff, Ted J., et al.. (1987). Information Management Challenges in the Software Design Process.. IEEE Data(base) Engineering Bulletin. 10. 24–31. 12 indexed citations

11.

Richter, Charles, et al.. (1985). The MCC software technology program. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes. 10(3). 33–36. 3 indexed citations

12.

Malizia, E & Charles Richter. (1973). Alternative Views On Development for the Coastal Plains Region. Review of Regional Studies. 3(2). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact