Charles R. Werth
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 1%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Genetics top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Co-authors
- James C. ParksSheldon I. GuttmanW. Hardy EshbaughMichael D. WindhamChristopher H. HauflerDavid S. BarringtonKhidir W. HiluPaula S. Williamson
- Topics
- Fern and Epiphyte Biology (14 papers)Plant and animal studies (12 papers)Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Charles R. Werth
39 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 873
- Plant Science 718
- Genetics 428
- Molecular Biology 310
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 233
Countries citing papers authored by Charles R. Werth
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles R. Werth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles R. Werth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles R. Werth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles R. Werth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles R. Werth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles R. Werth. The network helps show where Charles R. Werth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles R. Werth
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles R. Werth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles R. Werth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charles R. Werth. Charles R. Werth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 30 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 29 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 37 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 101 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | First records of alternate leaved spleenwort asplenium alternifolium in the new world | 2 |
| 14 | 150 | |
| 15 | 86 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 119 | |
| 18 | 23 | |
| 19 | 18 | |
| 20 | 12 |
About Charles R. Werth
Charles R. Werth is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Horticulture and Plant Science, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fern and Epiphyte Biology (14 papers), Plant and animal studies (12 papers) and Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (873 citations), Plant Science (718 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (233 citations). Charles R. Werth has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include James C. Parks, Sheldon I. Guttman, W. Hardy Eshbaugh, Michael D. Windham, Christopher H. Haufler, David S. Barrington, Khidir W. Hilu, Paula S. Williamson, Lytton J. Musselman and Mark A. McGinley. Their work appears in journals such as Science, The American Naturalist and American Journal of Botany.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.