Charles R. Watson
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
- Materials Chemistry
- General Health Professions
- Epidemiology
- Organic Chemistry
- Co-authors
- Carroll K. JohnsonEmma J. GlassonFiona StanleyJames B. SemmensMerran B. SmithIan RouseD L RosmanC. D’Arcy J. Holman
- Topics
- Magnetism in coordination complexes (3 papers)Organic and Molecular Conductors Research (3 papers)Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography (2 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Chemical SocietyPhysical Review LettersThe Journal of Chemical Physics
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaCanada
In The Last Decade
Charles R. Watson
12 papers receiving 679 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 165
- Materials Chemistry 114
- General Health Professions 89
- Epidemiology 77
- Organic Chemistry 67
Countries citing papers authored by Charles R. Watson
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles R. Watson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles R. Watson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles R. Watson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles R. Watson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles R. Watson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles R. Watson. The network helps show where Charles R. Watson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles R. Watson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles R. Watson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles R. Watson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charles R. Watson. Charles R. Watson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 433 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | Turn on, tune in, find out. | 1 |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 66 | |
| 8 | 76 | |
| 9 | 52 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 4 |
About Charles R. Watson
Charles R. Watson is a scholar working on Toxicology, Health Information Management and Organic Chemistry, having authored 14 papers that have together received 702 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetism in coordination complexes (3 papers), Organic and Molecular Conductors Research (3 papers) and Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (165 citations), Health (54 citations) and Health Information Management (23 citations). Charles R. Watson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Carroll K. Johnson, Emma J. Glasson, Fiona Stanley, James B. Semmens, Merran B. Smith, Ian Rouse, D L Rosman, C. D’Arcy J. Holman, Nicholas de Klerk and H. A. Mook. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Physical Review Letters and The Journal of Chemical Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.