Charles Pouchon

459 citations
9 papers · 219 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Charles Pouchon

8 papers receiving 218 citations

Peers

Charles Pouchon
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 106
  • Ecological Modeling 21
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 31
  • Genetics 64
  • Ecology 47
Replace Michael Gruenstaeudl with:
Michael Gruenstaeudl Germany
Martha Kandziora Czechia
Joanne L. Birch Australia
Xin Ding China
Dong‐Rui Jia China
A. Lovisa S. Gustafsson Norway
Kevin Karbstein Germany
Roman Businský Czechia
Daniela C. Soto United States
K. Bernhard von Hagen Germany
Charles Pouchon relative to Michael Gruenstaeudl Germany Michael Gruenstaeudl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Michael Gruenstaeudl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Charles Pouchon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Pouchon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Pouchon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Pouchon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Pouchon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Pouchon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Pouchon. The network helps show where Charles Pouchon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Charles Pouchon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Charles Pouchon Line = papers co-authored together Charles Pouchon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 201899
2 202057
3 202120
4 202112
5 202212
6 202211
7 20225
8 20233
9 20240

About Charles Pouchon

Charles Pouchon is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Plant Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 9 papers that have together received 219 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic diversity and population structure (6 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (5 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (4 papers), Plant and animal studies (3 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (3 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (1 paper), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (1 paper) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (106 citations), Ecological Modeling (21 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (31 citations), Genetics (64 citations) and Ecology (47 citations). Charles Pouchon has collaborated with scholars based in France, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Sébastien Lavergne, S. Aubert, Frédéric Boyer, Jesús Mavárez, Ángel Fernández, Jafet M. Nassar, Adriana Alberti, Inger Greve Alsos, Cristina Roquet and Éric Coissac. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Genetics and Genomics, Journal of Systematics and Evolution, Molecular Ecology Resources, Taxon and Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact