Charles J. Stanton

509 citations
7 papers · 446 indexed · h-index 7
Topics
CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts (7 papers)Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis (6 papers)N-Heterocyclic Carbenes in Organic and Inorganic Chemistry (3 papers)
Partner nations
United States

In The Last Decade

Charles J. Stanton

7 papers receiving 443 citations

Peers

Charles J. Stanton
Comparison fields: 5 of 20
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 362
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 276
  • Catalysis 169
  • Organic Chemistry 130
  • Materials Chemistry 56
Replace Joakim B. Jakobsen with:
Joakim B. Jakobsen Denmark
An D. Nguyen United States
Tetsunori Mizukawa Japan
Sergio Fernández Spain
Rafael Pavão das Chagas Brazil
Friederike Tewes Germany
Florian Schendzielorz Germany
Quinton J. Bruch United States
Philipp Gerschel Germany
Thomas G. Ostapowicz Germany
Charles J. Stanton relative to Joakim B. Jakobsen Denmark Joakim B. Jakobsen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16.4×
Joakim B. Jakobsen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Charles J. Stanton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles J. Stanton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles J. Stanton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles J. Stanton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles J. Stanton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles J. Stanton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles J. Stanton. The network helps show where Charles J. Stanton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles J. Stanton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles J. Stanton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles J. Stanton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charles J. Stanton. Charles J. Stanton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 33
2 84
3 47
4 67
5 125
6 63
7 27

About Charles J. Stanton

Charles J. Stanton is a scholar working on Process Chemistry and Technology, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and Catalysis, having authored 7 papers that have together received 446 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts (7 papers), Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis (6 papers) and N-Heterocyclic Carbenes in Organic and Inorganic Chemistry (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (276 citations), Catalysis (169 citations) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (362 citations). Charles J. Stanton has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Henry F. Schaefer, Jay Agarwal, George Majetich, Andrew B. Bocarsly, Travis W. Shaw, Charles W. Machan, Clifford P. Kubiak, Gonghu Li, Tong Jin and Da Wei He. Their work appears in journals such as Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Chemical Communications and Inorganic Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026