Charles H. Smith
- Geophysics top 10%
- Spectroscopy
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Atmospheric Science
- Co-authors
- Somdev BhattacharjiJ. L. JamborRonald F. SingNoel L. OwenI. D. M. MacgregorWilliam S. MilesGeorge Thodos
- Topics
- Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis (14 papers)NMR spectroscopy and applications (11 papers)Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Charles H. Smith
26 papers receiving 264 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Geophysics 138
- Spectroscopy 40
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 33
- Artificial Intelligence 31
- Atmospheric Science 31
Countries citing papers authored by Charles H. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles H. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles H. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles H. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles H. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles H. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles H. Smith. The network helps show where Charles H. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles H. Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles H. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles H. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charles H. Smith. Charles H. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | Comparison of Image Logs to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Logs | 1 |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 26 | |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | 25 | |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | The Upper Mantle Symposium, New Delhi, 1964 | 8 |
| 17 | 23 | |
| 18 | The use of chrome spinels in petrographic studies of ultramafic intrusions | 13 |
| 19 | On the occurrence and origin of xonotlite | 4 |
| 20 | 1 |
About Charles H. Smith
Charles H. Smith is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Internal Medicine and Geophysics, having authored 29 papers that have together received 295 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis (14 papers), NMR spectroscopy and applications (11 papers) and Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (138 citations), Internal Medicine (27 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (19 citations). Charles H. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Somdev Bhattacharji, J. L. Jambor, Ronald F. Sing, Noel L. Owen, I. D. M. Macgregor, William S. Miles and George Thodos. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Journal of the American Chemical Society and CHEST Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.