Charles Gosse
About
In The Last Decade
Charles Gosse
7 papers receiving 359 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Molecular Biology 271
- Oncology 112
- Organic Chemistry 105
- Toxicology 37
- Cancer Research 28
Countries citing papers authored by Charles Gosse
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Gosse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Gosse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Gosse more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Gosse
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Gosse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Gosse. The network helps show where Charles Gosse may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles Gosse
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles Gosse. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles Gosse based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charles Gosse. Charles Gosse is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 57 | |
| 3 | 38 | |
| 4 | 58 | |
| 5 | 200 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | Individual versus group caging of mice with grafted tumors. | 34 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.