Charles Douglas

923 total citations
38 papers, 606 citations indexed

About

Charles Douglas is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Charles Douglas has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 606 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in General Health Professions, 11 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 7 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Charles Douglas's work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (10 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (7 papers) and Patient Dignity and Privacy (6 papers). Charles Douglas is often cited by papers focused on Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (10 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (7 papers) and Patient Dignity and Privacy (6 papers). Charles Douglas collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Charles Douglas's co-authors include Ian Kerridge, Rachel A. Ankeny, Michael P. Hagan, Joachim Hallmayer, Roger Paterson, Patricia M. Davidson, Nicholas Zdenkowski, Brian L. Gulson, Michael J. Korsch and Alix Hall and has published in prestigious journals such as Environmental Health Perspectives, International Journal of Cancer and Annals of Surgical Oncology.

In The Last Decade

Charles Douglas

36 papers receiving 569 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Charles Douglas Australia 11 226 205 157 104 65 38 606
Alexander S. Niven United States 16 80 0.4× 77 0.4× 92 0.6× 94 0.9× 20 0.3× 60 812
Inger Schou Bredal Norway 12 89 0.4× 110 0.5× 95 0.6× 69 0.7× 26 0.4× 19 494
Gordian Fulde Australia 12 73 0.3× 144 0.7× 80 0.5× 77 0.7× 21 0.3× 35 457
N J Shanks United Kingdom 16 126 0.6× 35 0.2× 50 0.3× 144 1.4× 39 0.6× 28 549
Ejvind Frausing Hansen Denmark 17 25 0.1× 79 0.4× 104 0.7× 125 1.2× 51 0.8× 51 1.0k
Gaurav Kumar India 12 93 0.4× 118 0.6× 96 0.6× 39 0.4× 8 0.1× 40 473
Kathy Heathcote Australia 11 25 0.1× 80 0.4× 49 0.3× 107 1.0× 61 0.9× 19 427
Alicia Padrón‐Monedero Spain 14 64 0.3× 22 0.1× 67 0.4× 82 0.8× 45 0.7× 43 541
Marita Stier‐Jarmer Germany 13 66 0.3× 29 0.1× 47 0.3× 124 1.2× 211 3.2× 30 642
Abdulaziz Boker Saudi Arabia 12 258 1.1× 61 0.3× 84 0.5× 42 0.4× 19 0.3× 33 678

Countries citing papers authored by Charles Douglas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Douglas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Douglas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Douglas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Douglas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Douglas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Douglas. The network helps show where Charles Douglas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles Douglas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles Douglas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles Douglas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charles Douglas. Charles Douglas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Douglas, Charles, et al.. (2019). Barriers and pathways to informed consent for ionising radiation imaging examinations: A qualitative study. Radiography. 25(4). e88–e94. 4 indexed citations
2.
Douglas, Charles, et al.. (2019). Informed consent guidelines for ionising radiation examinations: A Delphi study. Radiography. 26(1). 63–70. 5 indexed citations
3.
Douglas, Charles, et al.. (2018). Medical imaging and informed consent – Can radiographers and patients agree upon a realistic best practice?. Radiography. 24(3). 204–210. 4 indexed citations
4.
Waller, Amy, et al.. (2018). Dances With Denial: Have Medical Oncology Outpatients Conveyed Their End-of-Life Wishes and Do They Want To?. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. 16(5). 498–505. 4 indexed citations
5.
Douglas, Charles, et al.. (2017). Ionising radiation risk disclosure: When should radiographers assume a duty to inform?. Radiography. 24(2). 146–150. 5 indexed citations
6.
Waller, Amy, Alix Hall, Rob Sanson‐Fisher, et al.. (2017). Do medical oncology patients and their support persons agree about end‐of‐life issues?. Internal Medicine Journal. 48(1). 60–66. 6 indexed citations
7.
Douglas, Charles. (2017). Addiction medicine ethics: relapse, no lapse and the struggle to treat addicts like everyone else. Internal Medicine Journal. 47(10). 1121–1123.
8.
9.
Zdenkowski, Nicholas, et al.. (2016). A survey of Australian and New Zealand clinical practice with neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer. Internal Medicine Journal. 46(6). 677–683. 5 indexed citations
10.
Douglas, Charles, Ian Kerridge, & Rachel A. Ankeny. (2014). Double Meanings Will Not Save the Principle of Double Effect. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine. 39(3). 304–316. 2 indexed citations
11.
Rossi, Enrico, et al.. (2012). Community blood lead survey with emphasis on preschool children following lead dust pollution in Esperance, Western Australia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 36(2). 171–175. 10 indexed citations
12.
Zardawi, Ibrahim M., et al.. (2012). The Accuracy of the ‘Triple Test’ in the Diagnosis of Papillary Lesions of the Breast. Acta Cytologica. 56(1). 41–46. 6 indexed citations
13.
Douglas, Charles, et al.. (2012). The Keystone Flap: Not an Advance, Just a Stretch. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 20(3). 973–980. 17 indexed citations
14.
Douglas, Charles, et al.. (2011). Decision aids for breast and nodal surgery in patients with early breast cancer: Development and a pilot study. Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology. 7(2). 114–122. 10 indexed citations
15.
Gulson, Brian L., et al.. (2008). Windblown Lead Carbonate as the Main Source of Lead in Blood of Children from a Seaside Community: An Example of Local Birds as “Canaries in the Mine”. Environmental Health Perspectives. 117(1). 148–154. 48 indexed citations
16.
Douglas, Charles, Ian Kerridge, & Rachel A. Ankeny. (2008). MANAGING INTENTIONS: THE END‐OF‐LIFE ADMINISTRATION OF ANALGESICS AND SEDATIVES, AND THE POSSIBILITY OF SLOW EUTHANASIA. Bioethics. 22(7). 388–396. 42 indexed citations
17.
Douglas, Charles & John McPhee. (2007). INFORMED CONSENT: A REVIEW OF THE ETHICAL AND LEGAL BASIS FOR MEDICAL DECISION‐MAKING FOR THE COMPETENT PATIENT. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 77(7). 521–522. 3 indexed citations
18.
Douglas, Charles, et al.. (2004). Protocol‐based approach to suspected appendicitis, incorporating the Alvarado score and outpatient antibiotics. ANZ Journal of Surgery. 74(5). 324–329. 32 indexed citations
19.
Douglas, Charles. (2000). Randomised controlled trial of ultrasonography in diagnosis of acute appendicitis, incorporating the Alvarado score. BMJ. 321(7266). 919–919. 167 indexed citations
20.
Davidson, Patricia M., Charles Douglas, & C. S. Hosking. (1999). Graded compression ultrasonography in the assessment of the "tough decision" acute abdomen in childhood. Pediatric Surgery International. 15(1). 32–35. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alexander S. Niven Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Inger Schou Bredal Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Gordian Fulde Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by N J Shanks Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ejvind Frausing Hansen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Gaurav Kumar Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kathy Heathcote Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alicia Padrón‐Monedero Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Marita Stier‐Jarmer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Abdulaziz Boker
Rankless by CCL
2026