Chao-Tsen Chen

701 citations
9 papers · 537 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Chao-Tsen Chen

9 papers receiving 533 citations

Peers

Chao-Tsen Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Polymers and Plastics 89
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 55
  • Materials Chemistry 204
  • Physiology 19
  • Biomaterials 54
Replace Kye‐Young Kim with:
Kye‐Young Kim United States
Kana Tanabe Japan
Sheng‐Yao Dai United States
Ashley L. Galloway United States
Jean Li United States
Sang Kwon Lee South Korea
Laurence J. Young United Kingdom
Sonja Hatz Denmark
Anand Saminathan United States
Hélène Nierengarten France
Chao-Tsen Chen relative to Kye‐Young Kim United States Kye‐Young Kim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Kye‐Young Kim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chao-Tsen Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chao-Tsen Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chao-Tsen Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chao-Tsen Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chao-Tsen Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chao-Tsen Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chao-Tsen Chen. The network helps show where Chao-Tsen Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chao-Tsen Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chao-Tsen Chen Line = papers co-authored together Chao-Tsen Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2013141
2 200684
3 201779
4 202172
5 201344
6 201638
7 201832
8 201330
9 200517

About Chao-Tsen Chen

Chao-Tsen Chen is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 9 papers that have together received 537 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics (4 papers), Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research (3 papers), Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (3 papers), Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (1 paper), Estrogen and related hormone effects (1 paper), Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications (1 paper), Enzyme Structure and Function (1 paper) and Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Polymers and Plastics (89 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (55 citations), Materials Chemistry (204 citations), Physiology (19 citations) and Biomaterials (54 citations). Chao-Tsen Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, Japan and China. Frequent co-authors include Chin‐Ti Chen, Bon‐chu Chung, Hwei‐Jan Hsu, Tsang-Pai Liu, Chih‐Ming Chou, Yi‐Ping Chen, Chung‐Yuan Mou, Yann Hung, Chien-Tsu Chen and Yi‐Ting Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Journal of Materials Chemistry C, Biochemical Journal, Journal of Materials Chemistry A and ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact