Changshui Yang
Impact in
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Ginger and Zingiberaceae research
- Biochemistry top 10%
- Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae
Papers in
- Biochemistry 10
- Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae 9
- Pharmacology 11
- Ginger and Zingiberaceae research 6
- Phytochemistry and Bioactivity Studies 2
- Co-authors
- Junsong WangXiaobing WangShuna CuiPing BoJuan WangJing QianQingqing WuChao Zhang
- Journals
- Tetrahedron (3 papers)Phytochemistry Letters (3 papers)Fitoterapia (2 papers)Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis (2 papers)Organic Letters (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- China
In The Last Decade
Changshui Yang
23 papers receiving 407 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Pharmacology 64
- Biochemistry 44
- Biomaterials 62
- Molecular Biology 213
- Pharmacology 46
Countries citing papers authored by Changshui Yang
This map shows the geographic impact of Changshui Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Changshui Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Changshui Yang more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Changshui Yang
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Changshui Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Changshui Yang. The network helps show where Changshui Yang may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Changshui Yang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 76 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 84 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 7 | |
| 19 | 2013 | 66 | |
| 20 | Chemical constituents from the seeds of Alpinia katsumadai Hayata. | 2010 | 7 |
About Changshui Yang
Changshui Yang is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Pharmacology, Rehabilitation, Molecular Biology and Plant Science, having authored 27 papers that have together received 412 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (9 papers), Ginger and Zingiberaceae research (6 papers), Bioactive Natural Diterpenoids Research (6 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (5 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (4 papers), Advanced Synthetic Organic Chemistry (3 papers), Phytochemistry and Bioactivity Studies (2 papers) and Magnolia and Illicium research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (64 citations), Biochemistry (44 citations), Biomaterials (62 citations), Molecular Biology (213 citations) and Pharmacology (46 citations). Changshui Yang has collaborated with scholars based in China. Frequent co-authors include Junsong Wang, Xiaobing Wang, Shuna Cui, Ping Bo, Juan Wang, Jing Qian, Qingqing Wu, Chao Zhang, Xiaoyun Dong and Lei Fan. Their work appears in journals such as Tetrahedron, Phytochemistry Letters, Fitoterapia, Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis and Organic Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.