Chang Wei

35 total papers · 479 total citations
23 papers, 412 citations indexed

About

Chang Wei is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering and Biomaterials. According to data from OpenAlex, Chang Wei has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 412 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Materials Chemistry, 9 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 7 papers in Biomaterials. Recurrent topics in Chang Wei's work include Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (9 papers), Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (6 papers) and Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies (4 papers). Chang Wei is often cited by papers focused on Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (9 papers), Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (6 papers) and Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies (4 papers). Chang Wei collaborates with scholars based in China and United Kingdom. Chang Wei's co-authors include Feng Lv, Xia Dong, Tianjun Liu, Deling Kong, Jie Liang, Tianjun Liu, Jie Liang, Xia Dong, Zhiyong Qian and Hongli Chen and has published in prestigious journals such as ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, Carbohydrate Polymers and Fuel.

In The Last Decade

Chang Wei

21 papers receiving 409 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Chang Wei	228	173	154	82	55	23	412
Barbara Cerroni	272 1.2×	106 0.6×	163 1.1×	53 0.6×	78 1.4×	26	475
Shuian‐Yin Lin	188 0.8×	78 0.5×	162 1.1×	48 0.6×	68 1.2×	19	382
Mina Yan	195 0.9×	108 0.6×	147 1.0×	71 0.9×	64 1.2×	13	423
Shuwen Fu	208 0.9×	67 0.4×	156 1.0×	47 0.6×	108 2.0×	17	386
Derek Hargrove	161 0.7×	84 0.5×	191 1.2×	90 1.1×	106 1.9×	15	431
Maharajan Sivasubramanian	205 0.9×	122 0.7×	94 0.6×	21 0.3×	75 1.4×	23	395
Yaoben Wang	225 1.0×	53 0.3×	188 1.2×	97 1.2×	61 1.1×	11	425
Gayoung Jo	293 1.3×	145 0.8×	152 1.0×	52 0.6×	95 1.7×	29	463
Fabiola Porta	162 0.7×	123 0.7×	233 1.5×	48 0.6×	125 2.3×	17	440
Ying Chen	284 1.2×	234 1.4×	75 0.5×	35 0.4×	71 1.3×	23	495

Countries citing papers authored by Chang Wei

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chang Wei's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chang Wei with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chang Wei more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chang Wei

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chang Wei. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chang Wei. The network helps show where Chang Wei may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chang Wei

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chang Wei. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chang Wei based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chang Wei. Chang Wei is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact