Chang H. Kim
- Immunology top 0.1%
- Molecular Biology top 1%
- Oncology top 0.5%
- Physiology top 1%
- Surgery top 5%
- Co-authors
- Hal E. BroxmeyerMyunghoo KimEugene C. ButcherSeung Goo KangHyung W. LimJeongho ParkPeter HillsamerMyung H. Kim
- Topics
- Immune Cell Function and Interaction (81 papers)T-cell and B-cell Immunology (67 papers)Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (60 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth KoreaFrance
In The Last Decade
Chang H. Kim
210 papers receiving 15.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 175
- Immunology 8.5k
- Molecular Biology 4.7k
- Oncology 3.5k
- Physiology 1.7k
- Surgery 1.1k
Countries citing papers authored by Chang H. Kim
This map shows the geographic impact of Chang H. Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chang H. Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chang H. Kim more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chang H. Kim
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chang H. Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chang H. Kim. The network helps show where Chang H. Kim may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chang H. Kim
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chang H. Kim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chang H. Kim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chang H. Kim. Chang H. Kim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | Control of lymphocyte functions by gut microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acidsbreakdown → | 261 |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 138 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 80 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 251 | |
| 13 | 102 | |
| 14 | A phenolic compound, 5-caffeoylquinic acid (chlorogenic acid), is a new type and strong matrix metalloproteinase-9 inhibitor | 2 |
| 15 | Safety Assessment of Lactobacillus fermentum PL9005, a Potential Probiotic Lactic Acid Bacterium, in Mice | 21 |
| 16 | 476 | |
| 17 | 129 | |
| 18 | 62 | |
| 19 | 149 | |
| 20 | 24 |
About Chang H. Kim
Chang H. Kim is a scholar working on Immunology, Biological Psychiatry and Oncology, having authored 217 papers that have together received 15.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Immune Cell Function and Interaction (81 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (67 papers) and Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (60 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Immunology (8.5k citations), Biological Psychiatry (474 citations) and Oncology (3.5k citations). Chang H. Kim has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and France. Frequent co-authors include Hal E. Broxmeyer, Myunghoo Kim, Eugene C. Butcher, Seung Goo Kang, Hyung W. Lim, Jeongho Park, Peter Hillsamer, Myung H. Kim, Daniel Campbell and Lusijah Rott. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, Journal of Clinical Investigation and Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.