Chakra Chaemfa

1.6k citations
21 papers · 1.3k indexed · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Chakra Chaemfa

21 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Chakra Chaemfa
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 1.1k
  • Environmental Chemistry 390
  • Pollution 356
  • Atmospheric Science 488
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 13
Replace Roman Prokeš with:
Roman Prokeš Czechia
T. Oliveira Portugal
Richard Grace United States
Liping Jiao China
Nicola Iacovella Italy
X.C. Jiao China
Anita Eng Canada
W.X. Liu China
Ondřej Sáňka Czechia
Robert G. M. Lee United Kingdom
Chakra Chaemfa relative to Roman Prokeš Czechia Roman Prokeš's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
Roman Prokeš · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chakra Chaemfa

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chakra Chaemfa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chakra Chaemfa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chakra Chaemfa more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chakra Chaemfa

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chakra Chaemfa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chakra Chaemfa. The network helps show where Chakra Chaemfa may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chakra Chaemfa, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chakra Chaemfa Line = papers co-authored together Chakra Chaemfa links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007294
2 2013147
3 2008102
4 2014100
5 200677
6 201376
7 201474
8 201368
9 200958
10 201451
11 200950
12 201545
13 201040
14 201440
15 200931
16 201426
17 201421
18 201412
19 200711
20 201410

About Chakra Chaemfa

Chakra Chaemfa is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Atmospheric Science, Pollution, Environmental Chemistry and Automotive Engineering, having authored 21 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (19 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (13 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (12 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (3 papers), Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research (3 papers), Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (2 papers), Microplastics and Plastic Pollution (2 papers) and Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (1.1k citations), Environmental Chemistry (390 citations), Pollution (356 citations), Atmospheric Science (488 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (13 citations). Chakra Chaemfa has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Kevin C. Jones, Jonathan L. Barber, Gan Zhang, Jun Li, Sandra Huber, Christian Temme, Urs Berger, Annika Jahnke, Tom Harner and Chunling Luo. Their work appears in journals such as The Science of The Total Environment, Chemosphere, Atmospheric Pollution Research, Environmental Pollution and Atmospheric Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact