Chadwick F. Smith
- Surgery top 10%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Rehabilitation top 2%
- Rheumatology
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- William L. OppenheimSTEPHEN P. KAYRonald W. SmithC. Thomas VangsnessG. June MarshallDonna C. BooneJohn V. BantaYoshio Setoguchi
- Topics
- Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (5 papers)Shoulder Injury and Treatment (4 papers)Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (4 papers)
- Cited by
- RehabilitationSurgeryEpidemiology
- Journals
- Journal of Bone and Joint SurgeryClinical Orthopaedics and Related ResearchArthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Chadwick F. Smith
27 papers receiving 576 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Surgery 479
- Epidemiology 339
- Rehabilitation 261
- Rheumatology 68
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 64
Countries citing papers authored by Chadwick F. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Chadwick F. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chadwick F. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chadwick F. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chadwick F. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chadwick F. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chadwick F. Smith. The network helps show where Chadwick F. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chadwick F. Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chadwick F. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chadwick F. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chadwick F. Smith. Chadwick F. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 47 | |
| 5 | 54 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | Lasers in orthopaedic surgery. | 2 |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | Popliteal pterygium syndrome: an orthopaedic perspective. | 9 |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 129 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 117 | |
| 17 | 37 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | Solitary unicameral bone cyst of the calcaneus. A review of twenty cases. | 58 |
About Chadwick F. Smith
Chadwick F. Smith is a scholar working on Anatomy, Equine and Developmental Biology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 622 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (5 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (4 papers) and Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (261 citations), Surgery (479 citations) and Epidemiology (339 citations). Chadwick F. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include William L. Oppenheim, STEPHEN P. KAY, Ronald W. Smith, C. Thomas Vangsness, G. June Marshall, Donna C. Boone, John V. Banta, Yoshio Setoguchi, J. Stuart Nelson and Lih‐Huei L. Liaw. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research and Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.