Chad M. Baum

1.4k total citations · 3 hit papers
52 papers, 870 citations indexed

About

Chad M. Baum is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Global and Planetary Change and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. According to data from OpenAlex, Chad M. Baum has authored 52 papers receiving a total of 870 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 26 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 12 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. Recurrent topics in Chad M. Baum's work include Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy (22 papers), Climate Change and Geoengineering (20 papers) and Climate Change Communication and Perception (13 papers). Chad M. Baum is often cited by papers focused on Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy (22 papers), Climate Change and Geoengineering (20 papers) and Climate Change Communication and Perception (13 papers). Chad M. Baum collaborates with scholars based in Denmark, United Kingdom and United States. Chad M. Baum's co-authors include Benjamin K. Sovacool, Sean Low, Livia Fritz, Hans De Steur, Stefanie Bröring, Carl Johan Lagerkvist, C. J. Gross, Wim Verbeke, Cameron Roberts and Bartosz Bartkowski and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

In The Last Decade

Chad M. Baum

51 papers receiving 828 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Public perceptions and support of climate intervention technologies across the Global North and Global South

2024 49 citations Chad M. Baum, Livia Fritz et al. Nature Communications profile →
Public engagement for inclusive and sustainable governance of climate interventions

2024 36 citations Livia Fritz, Chad M. Baum et al. Nature Communications profile →
Public perceptions on carbon removal from focus groups in 22 countries

2024 34 citations Sean Low, Livia Fritz et al. Nature Communications profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Chad M. Baum Denmark	18	296	287	148	133	122	52	870
Victoria Campbell-Árvai United States	14	178 0.6×	259 0.9×	108 0.7×	135 1.0×	251 2.1×	22	733
Lukas Fesenfeld Switzerland	12	139 0.5×	199 0.7×	158 1.1×	109 0.8×	162 1.3×	34	575
Pankaj Lal United States	17	279 0.9×	228 0.8×	265 1.8×	50 0.4×	164 1.3×	77	970
Therese Lindahl Sweden	13	192 0.6×	163 0.6×	105 0.7×	102 0.8×	154 1.3×	35	675
Chun‐Hung Lee Taiwan	21	170 0.6×	354 1.2×	216 1.5×	190 1.4×	215 1.8×	93	1.2k
Ousmane Coulibaly Benin	19	171 0.6×	70 0.2×	156 1.1×	105 0.8×	74 0.6×	59	1.2k
Hilde Toonen Netherlands	15	154 0.5×	118 0.4×	42 0.3×	179 1.3×	263 2.2×	35	692
Odirilwe Selomane South Africa	16	381 1.3×	182 0.6×	159 1.1×	137 1.0×	169 1.4×	32	956
Mohd Rusli Yacob Malaysia	19	215 0.7×	258 0.9×	352 2.4×	84 0.6×	152 1.2×	66	856
Caroline L. Noblet United States	19	237 0.8×	258 0.9×	251 1.7×	69 0.5×	419 3.4×	48	1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Chad M. Baum

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chad M. Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chad M. Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chad M. Baum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chad M. Baum

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chad M. Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chad M. Baum. The network helps show where Chad M. Baum may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chad M. Baum

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chad M. Baum. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chad M. Baum based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chad M. Baum. Chad M. Baum is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Fritz, Livia, et al.. (2025). Between inflated expectations and inherent distrust: How publics see the role of experts in governing climate intervention technologies. Environmental Science & Policy. 164. 104005–104005. 1 indexed citations

Cox, Emily, Sean Low, Chad M. Baum, et al.. (2025). Carbon removal beyond the trees. Communications Earth & Environment. 6(1). 253–253. 3 indexed citations

Malakar, Yuwan, Chad M. Baum, John T. Gardner, et al.. (2025). Beyond environmental identity: Testing public support for novel carbon dioxide removal in Australia using structural modelling. Journal of Environmental Management. 394. 127633–127633.

Baum, Chad M., Elina Brutschin, Livia Fritz, & Benjamin K. Sovacool. (2025). A new hope or phantom menace? Exploring climate emotions and public support for climate interventions across 30 countries. Risk Analysis. 45(8). 2323–2340. 1 indexed citations

Baum, Chad M., Nathalie Sick, & Stefanie Bröring. (2025). Drivers for the emergence of interdisciplinary knowledge areas: An actor-level perspective on building legitimacy for the case of synthetic life sciences. Technovation. 141. 103173–103173. 2 indexed citations

Low, Sean, Elina Brutschin, Chad M. Baum, & Benjamin K. Sovacool. (2025). Expert perspectives on incorporating justice considerations into integrated assessment modelling. npj Climate Action. 4(1). 1 indexed citations

Baum, Chad M., Thomas B. Fischer, Stewart Lockie, et al.. (2024). A call for strategic assessments of regional applications of solar radiation management: Exploring the challenges and opportunities from marine cloud brightening and albedo surface modification. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 110. 107701–107701. 2 indexed citations

Low, Sean, Livia Fritz, Chad M. Baum, & Benjamin K. Sovacool. (2024). Public perceptions on solar geoengineering from focus groups in 22 countries. Communications Earth & Environment. 5(1). 8 indexed citations

Baum, Chad M., Livia Fritz, Sean Low, & Benjamin K. Sovacool. (2024). Public perceptions and support of climate intervention technologies across the Global North and Global South. Nature Communications. 15(1). 2060–2060. 49 indexed citations breakdown →

10.

Baum, Chad M., et al.. (2024). A geographic analysis and techno-economic assessment of renewable heat sources for low-temperature direct air capture in Europe. Energy Conversion and Management. 323. 119186–119186. 7 indexed citations

11.

Fritz, Livia, Chad M. Baum, Sean Low, & Benjamin K. Sovacool. (2024). Public engagement for inclusive and sustainable governance of climate interventions. Nature Communications. 15(1). 4168–4168. 36 indexed citations breakdown →

12.

Low, Sean, Livia Fritz, Chad M. Baum, & Benjamin K. Sovacool. (2024). Public perceptions on carbon removal from focus groups in 22 countries. Nature Communications. 15(1). 3453–3453. 34 indexed citations breakdown →

13.

Sovacool, Benjamin K., Darrick Evensen, Chad M. Baum, Livia Fritz, & Sean Low. (2024). Demographics shape public preferences for carbon dioxide removal and solar geoengineering interventions across 30 countries. Communications Earth & Environment. 5(1). 642–642. 3 indexed citations

14.

Baum, Chad M., et al.. (2023). Exploring actors' perceptions of the precision agriculture innovation system – A Group Concept Mapping approach in Germany and Switzerland. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 189. 122270–122270. 16 indexed citations

15.

Sovacool, Benjamin K., Chad M. Baum, Sean Low, & Livia Fritz. (2023). Coral reefs, cloud forests and radical climate interventions in Australia’s Wet Tropics and Great Barrier Reef. PLOS Climate. 2(10). e0000221–e0000221. 12 indexed citations

16.

Müller-Hansen, Finn, Chad M. Baum, Elina Brutschin, et al.. (2023). Attention, sentiments and emotions towards emerging climate technologies on Twitter. Global Environmental Change. 83. 102765–102765. 21 indexed citations

17.

Sovacool, Benjamin K., Chad M. Baum, & Sean Low. (2022). Determining our climate policy future: expert opinions about negative emissions and solar radiation management pathways. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. 27(8). 58–58. 9 indexed citations

18.

Enevoldsen, Peter, Chad M. Baum, Sean Low, & Benjamin K. Sovacool. (2022). Examining the synergies and tradeoffs of net-zero climate protection with the Sustainable Development Goals. Science Progress. 105(4). 322108939–322108939. 8 indexed citations

19.

Verbeke, Wim, Yung Hung, Chad M. Baum, & Hans De Steur. (2021). The power of initial perceived barriers versus motives shaping consumers’ willingness to eat cultured meat as a substitute for conventional meat. Livestock Science. 253. 104705–104705. 33 indexed citations

20.

Bartkowski, Bartosz & Chad M. Baum. (2019). Dealing With Rejection: An Application of the Exit–Voice Framework to Genome-Edited Food. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 7. 57–57. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact