Chad Gonnerman

892 total citations
25 papers, 402 citations indexed

About

Chad Gonnerman is a scholar working on Philosophy, Information Systems and Management and History and Philosophy of Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Chad Gonnerman has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 402 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Philosophy, 7 papers in Information Systems and Management and 6 papers in History and Philosophy of Science. Recurrent topics in Chad Gonnerman's work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (9 papers), Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration (7 papers) and Philosophy and History of Science (6 papers). Chad Gonnerman is often cited by papers focused on Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (9 papers), Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration (7 papers) and Philosophy and History of Science (6 papers). Chad Gonnerman collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Denmark. Chad Gonnerman's co-authors include Michael O’Rourke, Jonathan M. Weinberg, Stephen Crowley, Joshua Alexander, Cameron Buckner, Daniel Steel, Brian Robinson, Bethany K. Laursen, Klaus Keller and Andrew M. Parker and has published in prestigious journals such as Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Global Environmental Change and Ecology and Society.

In The Last Decade

Chad Gonnerman

24 papers receiving 386 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Chad Gonnerman United States 10 143 137 107 81 65 25 402
Jonas Olson Sweden 11 460 3.2× 340 2.5× 20 0.2× 45 0.6× 31 0.5× 36 614
Andrew Sneddon Canada 10 90 0.6× 121 0.9× 27 0.3× 72 0.9× 18 0.3× 68 370
Donald C. Hubin United States 9 280 2.0× 210 1.5× 14 0.1× 67 0.8× 13 0.2× 20 452
Frederick Ferré United States 9 45 0.3× 40 0.3× 13 0.1× 111 1.4× 25 0.4× 40 330
Rick Rylance United Kingdom 6 21 0.1× 26 0.2× 29 0.3× 35 0.4× 15 0.2× 17 210
George Santayana 10 108 0.8× 41 0.3× 5 0.0× 94 1.2× 33 0.5× 81 422
Robert C. Scharff United States 7 32 0.2× 42 0.3× 7 0.1× 49 0.6× 29 0.4× 40 191
Thomas M. Alexander United States 8 73 0.5× 22 0.2× 11 0.1× 61 0.8× 9 0.1× 25 238
Christoph Lumer Italy 10 118 0.8× 57 0.4× 5 0.0× 33 0.4× 8 0.1× 46 297
Deryck Beyleveld United Kingdom 12 55 0.4× 60 0.4× 7 0.1× 143 1.8× 4 0.1× 59 509

Countries citing papers authored by Chad Gonnerman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chad Gonnerman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chad Gonnerman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chad Gonnerman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chad Gonnerman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chad Gonnerman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chad Gonnerman. The network helps show where Chad Gonnerman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chad Gonnerman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chad Gonnerman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chad Gonnerman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chad Gonnerman. Chad Gonnerman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Laursen, Bethany K., Chad Gonnerman, & Stephen Crowley. (2021). Improving philosophical dialogue interventions to better resolve problematic value pluralism in collaborative environmental science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 87. 54–71. 14 indexed citations
3.
Gerken, Mikkel, et al.. (2020). Salient Alternatives in Perspective. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 98(4). 792–810. 4 indexed citations
4.
Robinson, Brian, Chad Gonnerman, & Michael O’Rourke. (2019). Experimental Philosophy of Science and Philosophical Differences across the Sciences. Philosophy of Science. 86(3). 551–576. 14 indexed citations
5.
Steel, Daniel, et al.. (2018). Gender and Scientists’ Views about the Value-Free Ideal. Perspectives on Science. 26(6). 619–657. 7 indexed citations
6.
Gonnerman, Chad, et al.. (2018). Knowledge, Certainty, and Skepticism. Oxford University Press eBooks. 1 indexed citations
7.
Gonnerman, Chad, et al.. (2018). Knowledge, certainty, and skepticism: A cross-cultural study. 2 indexed citations
8.
Steel, Daniel, Chad Gonnerman, & Michael O’Rourke. (2017). Scientists’ attitudes on science and values: Case studies and survey methods in philosophy of science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 63. 22–30. 22 indexed citations
9.
Alexander, Joshua, et al.. (2017). Framing how we think about disagreement. Philosophical Studies. 175(10). 2539–2566. 3 indexed citations
10.
Tuana, Nancy, et al.. (2016). Understanding scientists’ computational modeling decisions about climate risk management strategies using values-informed mental models. Global Environmental Change. 42. 107–116. 28 indexed citations
11.
Crowley, Stephen, Chad Gonnerman, & Michael O’Rourke. (2016). Cross-Disciplinary Research as a Platform for Philosophical Research. Journal of the American Philosophical Association. 2(2). 344–363. 10 indexed citations
12.
Gonnerman, Chad, et al.. (2016). Human values and the value of humanities in interdisciplinary research. Cogent Arts and Humanities. 3(1). 1123080–1123080. 17 indexed citations
13.
Jensen, Erik Steen, et al.. (2016). The Production and Reinforcement of Ignorance in Collaborative Interdisciplinary Research. Social Epistemology. 30(5-6). 643–664. 6 indexed citations
14.
O’Rourke, Michael, Stephen Crowley, & Chad Gonnerman. (2015). On the nature of cross-disciplinary integration: A philosophical framework. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. 56. 62–70. 97 indexed citations
15.
Weinberg, Jonathan M., et al.. (2013). Restrictionism and Reflection. 4 indexed citations
16.
Weinberg, Jonathan M., et al.. (2012). Restrictionism and Reflection. The Monist. 95(2). 200–222. 26 indexed citations
17.
Weinberg, Jonathan M., et al.. (2012). Intuition & Calibration. Essays in Philosophy. 13(1). 257–284. 9 indexed citations
18.
Gonnerman, Chad & Jonathan M. Weinberg. (2010). Two uneliminated uses for “concepts”: Hybrids and guides for inquiry. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 33(2-3). 211–212. 5 indexed citations
19.
Weinberg, Jonathan M., Chad Gonnerman, Cameron Buckner, & Joshua Alexander. (2010). Are philosophers expert intuiters?. Philosophical Psychology. 23(3). 331–355. 123 indexed citations
20.
Gonnerman, Chad. (2008). Reading Conflicted Minds: An Empirical Follow-up to Knobe and Roedder. Philosophical Psychology. 21(2). 193–205. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026