Chad Barrett

2.4k total citations
12 papers, 293 citations indexed

About

Chad Barrett is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Economics and Econometrics and Computational Theory and Mathematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Chad Barrett has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 293 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 6 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 4 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics. Recurrent topics in Chad Barrett's work include Multi-Criteria Decision Making (5 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (3 papers) and Advanced Algebra and Logic (3 papers). Chad Barrett is often cited by papers focused on Multi-Criteria Decision Making (5 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (3 papers) and Advanced Algebra and Logic (3 papers). Chad Barrett collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and Spain. Chad Barrett's co-authors include Prasanta K. Pattanaik, Maurice Salles, Salvador Barberà, Roger Tarling and Geoffrey Heal and has published in prestigious journals such as Econometrica, Fuzzy Sets and Systems and Journal of Economic Theory.

In The Last Decade

Chad Barrett

12 papers receiving 279 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Chad Barrett United Kingdom 7 215 124 93 77 62 12 293
Maurice Salles France 8 228 1.1× 167 1.3× 88 0.9× 76 1.0× 58 0.9× 34 336
Alfio Giarlotta Italy 11 168 0.8× 106 0.9× 115 1.2× 44 0.6× 74 1.2× 39 361
Heinz J. Skala Germany 9 112 0.5× 45 0.4× 77 0.8× 36 0.5× 71 1.1× 20 222
Aldo G. S. Ventre Italy 8 114 0.5× 21 0.2× 59 0.6× 29 0.4× 87 1.4× 35 224
F. J. Girón Spain 13 93 0.4× 61 0.5× 21 0.2× 334 4.3× 216 3.5× 37 493
Michel Grabisch France 8 126 0.6× 38 0.3× 41 0.4× 30 0.4× 50 0.8× 14 184
C. Villegas Canada 9 40 0.2× 57 0.5× 19 0.2× 135 1.8× 90 1.5× 22 283
Gerhard Herden Germany 13 84 0.4× 147 1.2× 186 2.0× 44 0.6× 53 0.9× 35 418
Vincenzo Scalzo Italy 10 163 0.8× 191 1.5× 123 1.3× 33 0.4× 10 0.2× 31 281
Tomáš Kroupa Czechia 8 109 0.5× 49 0.4× 188 2.0× 33 0.4× 149 2.4× 30 296

Countries citing papers authored by Chad Barrett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chad Barrett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chad Barrett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chad Barrett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chad Barrett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chad Barrett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chad Barrett. The network helps show where Chad Barrett may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chad Barrett

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chad Barrett. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chad Barrett based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chad Barrett. Chad Barrett is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
1.
Barrett, Chad & Maurice Salles. (1996). On a generalisation of the Gini coefficient. Mathematical Social Sciences. 31(1). 56–56. 4 indexed citations
2.
Barrett, Chad & Maurice Salles. (1995). On a generalisation of the Gini coefficient. Mathematical Social Sciences. 30(3). 235–244. 7 indexed citations
3.
Barrett, Chad, Prasanta K. Pattanaik, & Maurice Salles. (1992). Rationality and aggregation of preferences in an ordinally fuzzy framework. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 49(1). 9–13. 33 indexed citations
4.
Barrett, Chad, Prasanta K. Pattanaik, & Maurice Salles. (1990). On choosing rationally when preferences are fuzzy. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 34(2). 197–212. 98 indexed citations
5.
Barrett, Chad. (1990). Fuzzy preferences and choice: A further progress report. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 37(2). 261–262. 2 indexed citations
6.
Barrett, Chad. (1989). Measurement in economics: Theory and applications of economic indices. Social Choice and Welfare. 6(4). 347–348. 17 indexed citations
7.
Barrett, Chad & Prasanta K. Pattanaik. (1989). Bargaining over employment and wages, with threats of strikes and lockouts. European Journal of Political Economy. 5(2-3). 333–345. 2 indexed citations
8.
Barrett, Chad & Prasanta K. Pattanaik. (1989). FUZZY SETS, PREFERENCE AND CHOICE: SOME CONCEPTUAL ISSUES*. Bulletin of Economic Research. 41(4). 229–254. 32 indexed citations
9.
Barrett, Chad & Prasanta K. Pattanaik. (1987). Aggregation of Probability Judgments. Econometrica. 55(5). 1237–1237. 2 indexed citations
10.
Barrett, Chad, Prasanta K. Pattanaik, & Maurice Salles. (1986). On the structure of fuzzy social welfare functions. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 19(1). 1–10. 51 indexed citations
11.
Barberà, Salvador, Chad Barrett, & Prasanta K. Pattanaik. (1984). On some axioms for ranking sets of alternatives. Journal of Economic Theory. 33(2). 301–308. 44 indexed citations
12.
Barrett, Chad, et al.. (1976). Linear Algebra and Linear Economics.. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General). 139(1). 130–130. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026