Chack‐kie Wong
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Finance top 10%
- Public Administration top 10%
- Co-authors
- Alan WalkerKa‐Ying WongKwong‐leung TangChristian AspalterVai Io LoVW LouVictor TamShengquan Ye
- Topics
- Social Policy and Reform Studies (14 papers)Employment and Welfare Studies (8 papers)Labor Movements and Unions (4 papers)
In The Last Decade
Chack‐kie Wong
26 papers receiving 231 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Political Science and International Relations 152
- Sociology and Political Science 128
- General Health Professions 111
- Finance 49
- Public Administration 43
Countries citing papers authored by Chack‐kie Wong
This map shows the geographic impact of Chack‐kie Wong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chack‐kie Wong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chack‐kie Wong more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chack‐kie Wong
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chack‐kie Wong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chack‐kie Wong. The network helps show where Chack‐kie Wong may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chack‐kie Wong
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chack‐kie Wong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chack‐kie Wong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chack‐kie Wong. Chack‐kie Wong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Setting the Poverty Line: Policy Implications for Squaring the Welfare Circle in Hong Kong | 2 |
| 2 | 16 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | The Relationship between Social Policy and Economic Policy: Constructing the Public Burden of Welfare in China and the West* | 5 |
| 7 | Comparing Social Quality and Social Harmony from a Governance Perspective | 6 |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | The Case for an Expenditure-Based Poverty Line for the Newly | 2 |
| 14 | The Case for an Expenditure-Based Poverty Line for the Newly Industrialized East Asian Societies* | 3 |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | How Many Poor People in Shanghai Today? The Question of Poverty and Poverty Measure | 8 |
| 19 | 38 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Chack‐kie Wong
Chack‐kie Wong is a scholar working on Public Administration, Political Science and International Relations and Finance, having authored 28 papers that have together received 268 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Policy and Reform Studies (14 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (8 papers) and Labor Movements and Unions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (43 citations), Political Science and International Relations (152 citations) and Finance (49 citations). Chack‐kie Wong has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, Canada and China. Frequent co-authors include Alan Walker, Ka‐Ying Wong, Kwong‐leung Tang, Christian Aspalter, Vai Io Lo, VW Lou, Victor Tam, Shengquan Ye, Hung Wong and Chau‐kiu Cheung. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Social Indicators Research and International Journal of Health Services.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.