C.G.R. Nash

653 total citations
9 papers, 514 citations indexed

About

C.G.R. Nash is a scholar working on Small Animals, Animal Science and Zoology and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, C.G.R. Nash has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 514 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Small Animals, 7 papers in Animal Science and Zoology and 4 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in C.G.R. Nash's work include Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (9 papers), Agriculture and Farm Safety (4 papers) and Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock (4 papers). C.G.R. Nash is often cited by papers focused on Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (9 papers), Agriculture and Farm Safety (4 papers) and Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock (4 papers). C.G.R. Nash collaborates with scholars based in Canada, China and France. C.G.R. Nash's co-authors include Derek B. Haley, J. Rushen, D. Pellerin, E. Vasseur, A.M. de Passillé, S.J. LeBlanc, Herman W. Barkema, Karin Orsel, L. Solano and Edmond A. Pajor and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Dairy Science and Canadian Journal of Animal Science.

In The Last Decade

C.G.R. Nash

9 papers receiving 501 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C.G.R. Nash Canada 8 474 337 201 198 116 9 514
Å.M. Sogstad Norway 10 415 0.9× 249 0.7× 189 0.9× 230 1.2× 91 0.8× 14 488
A.J. Packington United Kingdom 6 494 1.0× 330 1.0× 201 1.0× 264 1.3× 90 0.8× 7 579
Julie Føske Johnsen Norway 14 505 1.1× 321 1.0× 203 1.0× 229 1.2× 75 0.6× 27 581
E. Telezhenko Sweden 13 515 1.1× 415 1.2× 203 1.0× 178 0.9× 144 1.2× 20 620
Laura V. Randall United Kingdom 12 283 0.6× 228 0.7× 149 0.7× 204 1.0× 44 0.4× 23 386
Katharina Friedli Switzerland 10 303 0.6× 222 0.7× 114 0.6× 102 0.5× 78 0.7× 19 350
J.G.C.J. Somers Netherlands 5 514 1.1× 302 0.9× 143 0.7× 217 1.1× 125 1.1× 6 556
Thomas Manske Sweden 5 484 1.0× 269 0.8× 118 0.6× 235 1.2× 126 1.1× 5 516
J.L. Wright United Kingdom 5 399 0.8× 211 0.6× 117 0.6× 222 1.1× 69 0.6× 6 443
W. Ward United Kingdom 8 404 0.9× 288 0.9× 176 0.9× 238 1.2× 79 0.7× 9 486

Countries citing papers authored by C.G.R. Nash

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C.G.R. Nash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.G.R. Nash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.G.R. Nash more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C.G.R. Nash

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.G.R. Nash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.G.R. Nash. The network helps show where C.G.R. Nash may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C.G.R. Nash

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C.G.R. Nash. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C.G.R. Nash based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C.G.R. Nash. C.G.R. Nash is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Nash, C.G.R., C.A. Bauman, S.J. LeBlanc, et al.. (2018). Training method for animal-based measures in dairy cattle welfare assessments. Journal of Dairy Science. 101(10). 9463–9471. 11 indexed citations
2.
Nash, C.G.R., D.F. Kelton, E. Vasseur, et al.. (2018). A survey of practices implemented to improve cow comfort following an initial assessment on Canadian dairy farms. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 99(1). 107–115. 4 indexed citations
3.
Passillé, A.M. de, J. Rushen, E. Vasseur, et al.. (2017). Effect of following recommendations for tiestall configuration on neck and leg lesions, lameness, cleanliness, and lying time in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 100(4). 2935–2943. 45 indexed citations
4.
Nash, C.G.R., Renée Bergeron, D. Pellerin, et al.. (2017). Technical note: Assessing lameness in tie-stalls using live stall lameness scoring. Journal of Dairy Science. 100(8). 6577–6582. 24 indexed citations
5.
Solano, L., Herman W. Barkema, Edmond A. Pajor, et al.. (2016). Associations between lying behavior and lameness in Canadian Holstein-Friesian cows housed in freestall barns. Journal of Dairy Science. 99(3). 2086–2101. 88 indexed citations
6.
Nash, C.G.R., D.F. Kelton, T.J. DeVries, et al.. (2016). Prevalence of and risk factors for hock and knee injuries on dairy cows in tiestall housing in Canada. Journal of Dairy Science. 99(8). 6494–6506. 45 indexed citations
7.
Solano, L., Herman W. Barkema, Edmond A. Pajor, et al.. (2015). Prevalence of lameness and associated risk factors in Canadian Holstein-Friesian cows housed in freestall barns. Journal of Dairy Science. 98(10). 6978–6991. 195 indexed citations
8.
Gibbons, Jenny, Derek B. Haley, C.G.R. Nash, et al.. (2013). Technical note: A comparison of 2 methods of assessing lameness prevalence in tiestall herds. Journal of Dairy Science. 97(1). 350–353. 35 indexed citations
9.
LeBlanc, S.J., T.J. DeVries, C.G.R. Nash, et al.. (2013). Prevalence of and factors associated with hock, knee, and neck injuries on dairy cows in freestall housing in Canada. Journal of Dairy Science. 97(1). 173–184. 67 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026