Ceno Agena
About
In The Last Decade
Ceno Agena
14 papers receiving 571 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Organic Chemistry 393
- Spectroscopy 300
- Materials Chemistry 181
- Biomaterials 148
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 148
Countries citing papers authored by Ceno Agena
This map shows the geographic impact of Ceno Agena's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ceno Agena with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ceno Agena more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ceno Agena
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ceno Agena. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ceno Agena. The network helps show where Ceno Agena may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ceno Agena
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ceno Agena. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ceno Agena based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ceno Agena. Ceno Agena is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 19 | |
| 3 | 23 | |
| 4 | 30 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 82 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 40 | |
| 9 | 33 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 31 | |
| 12 | 24 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 250 | |
| 15 | 0 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.