Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Information Transmission in Irrigation Technology Adoption and Diffusion: Social Learning, Extension Services, and Spatial Effects
2013288 citationsPhoebe Koundouri, Céline Nauges et al.profile →
Uncertainty, Learning, and Technology Adoption in Agriculture
This map shows the geographic impact of Céline Nauges's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Céline Nauges with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Céline Nauges more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Céline Nauges. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Céline Nauges. The network helps show where Céline Nauges may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Céline Nauges
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Céline Nauges.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Céline Nauges based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Céline Nauges. Céline Nauges is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Nauges, Céline & Jon Strand. (2013). Water Hauling and Girls' School Attendance: Some New Evidence from Ghana. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
7.
Latruffe, Laure, Céline Nauges, & Yann Desjeux. (2013). Motivations et freins à la conversion en agriculture biologique des producteurs laitiers et légumiers : Résultats d’une enquête à grande échelle en Bretagne et en Pays de la Loire. HNO. 5(12). 353–5.
8.
Géniaux, Ghislain, et al.. (2011). The drivers of the conversion in organic farming (OF): a review of the economic literature. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).2 indexed citations
9.
Koundouri, Phoebe, Marita Laukkanen, Sami Myyrä, & Céline Nauges. (2009). The Effects of EU Agricultural Policy Changes on Farmers' Risk Attitudes. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
Nauges, Céline, Alain Carpentier, Arnaud Reynaud, & Alban Thomas. (2006). Effets de la delegation sur le prix de l'eau potable en France: une analyse a partir de la litterature sur les effets de traitement [The impact of delegating water supply services on the price of water in France: An analysis using treatment effects]. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 174(3). 1–1.11 indexed citations
Motta, Ronaldo Serôa da, et al.. (2004). Economic Instruments for Water Management. Books.2 indexed citations
16.
Millock, Katrin, Céline Nauges, & Thomas Sterner. (2004). Environmental Taxes: A Comparison of French and Swedish Experience from Taxes on Industrial Air Pollution. CESifo DICE report. 2(1). 30–34.18 indexed citations
17.
Nauges, Céline & Alban Thomas. (2003). Consistent estimation of dynamic panel data models with time-varying individual effects. Annals of Economics and Statistics. 53–75.12 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.