Céline De Meyere

873 total citations
25 papers, 136 citations indexed

About

Céline De Meyere is a scholar working on Surgery, Hepatology and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Céline De Meyere has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 136 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Surgery, 16 papers in Hepatology and 14 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Céline De Meyere's work include Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (16 papers), Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (11 papers) and Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (8 papers). Céline De Meyere is often cited by papers focused on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (16 papers), Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (11 papers) and Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (8 papers). Céline De Meyere collaborates with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and United States. Céline De Meyere's co-authors include Isabelle Parmentier, Mathieu D’Hondt, Chris Verslype, Hans Pottel, Frederiek Nuytens, E. Willems, Mathieu D’Hondt, Marc G. Besselink, Dennis A. Wicherts and Franky Vansteenkiste and has published in prestigious journals such as World Journal of Surgery, Surgical Endoscopy and Nursing Research.

In The Last Decade

Céline De Meyere

22 papers receiving 135 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Céline De Meyere Belgium 7 92 76 51 35 12 25 136
Hannah Schilperoort United States 6 105 1.1× 64 0.8× 25 0.5× 70 2.0× 6 0.5× 9 203
Mihailo Andric Germany 7 80 0.9× 40 0.5× 42 0.8× 30 0.9× 3 0.3× 26 120
Amr M. Yassen Egypt 8 115 1.3× 106 1.4× 10 0.2× 16 0.5× 2 0.2× 26 163
Timothy M. Pawlik United States 7 81 0.9× 37 0.5× 70 1.4× 57 1.6× 31 161
Gabriele Marangoni United Kingdom 4 80 0.9× 52 0.7× 21 0.4× 47 1.3× 1 0.1× 5 137
Yoshito Uenoyama Japan 6 169 1.8× 45 0.6× 49 1.0× 135 3.9× 4 0.3× 24 188
Shivakumar Thiagarajan India 9 96 1.0× 32 0.4× 49 1.0× 34 1.0× 1 0.1× 44 183
Mirela Dănilă Romania 7 26 0.3× 51 0.7× 23 0.5× 16 0.5× 5 0.4× 18 107
Carlo Corbellini Italy 5 43 0.5× 20 0.3× 43 0.8× 21 0.6× 4 0.3× 13 74
Javier López‐Monclús Spain 12 412 4.5× 45 0.6× 45 0.9× 103 2.9× 6 0.5× 34 452

Countries citing papers authored by Céline De Meyere

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Céline De Meyere's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Céline De Meyere with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Céline De Meyere more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Céline De Meyere

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Céline De Meyere. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Céline De Meyere. The network helps show where Céline De Meyere may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Céline De Meyere

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Céline De Meyere. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Céline De Meyere based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Céline De Meyere. Céline De Meyere is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Troisi, Roberto, Gianluca Rompianesi, Mathieu D’Hondt, et al.. (2025). Multicenter Belgian prospective registry on minimally invasive and open liver surgery (BReLLS): experience from 1342 consecutive cases. Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery. 410(1). 86–86.
4.
Willems, E., et al.. (2024). Robotic versus laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy: A comparative single-center study of perioperative outcomes. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 51(1). 109376–109376. 2 indexed citations
5.
Bosch, Gerbrich E. van den, Fernando Burdı́o, Céline De Meyere, et al.. (2024). Complete hepatic caudate lobe resection: is robotic approach safe? Report from experienced centers. Journal of Robotic Surgery. 19(1). 23–23. 1 indexed citations
6.
Meyere, Céline De, et al.. (2024). Robotic liver parenchymal transection using the SynchroSeal. Surgical Endoscopy. 38(9). 4947–4955. 5 indexed citations
7.
Wicherts, Dennis A., et al.. (2023). Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Hepatectomy: A Single Surgeon Experience of 629 Consecutive Minimally Invasive Liver Resections. World Journal of Surgery. 47(9). 2241–2249. 10 indexed citations
8.
Vansteenkiste, Franky, et al.. (2023). Morbidity and survival after laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: propensity score matched comparison. Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery. 408(1). 16–16. 1 indexed citations
9.
Meyere, Céline De, Frederiek Nuytens, Louis Libbrecht, et al.. (2022). Laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases: retrospective analysis of prognostic factors and oncological outcomes in a single-center cohort. Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery. 407(6). 2399–2414. 3 indexed citations
10.
D’Hondt, Mathieu, E. Willems, Dennis A. Wicherts, et al.. (2022). Transition from laparoscopic to robotic liver surgery: clinical outcomes, learning curve effect, and cost-effectiveness. Journal of Robotic Surgery. 17(1). 79–88. 21 indexed citations
11.
Meyere, Céline De, et al.. (2021). The role of the laparoscopic approach in two-stage hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases: a single-center experience. Surgical Endoscopy. 36(1). 559–568. 5 indexed citations
12.
D’Hondt, Mathieu, Isabelle Parmentier, Céline De Meyere, et al.. (2021). One-stage laparoscopic parenchymal sparing liver resection for bilobar colorectal liver metastases: safety, recurrence patterns and oncologic outcomes. Surgical Endoscopy. 36(2). 1018–1026. 5 indexed citations
13.
Meyere, Céline De, et al.. (2021). Laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases — short- and long-term outcomes: A systematic review. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. 13(7). 732–757. 6 indexed citations
14.
D’Hondt, Mathieu, et al.. (2020). The laparoscopic approach for two stage hepatectomy: A single center five year experience. HPB. 22. S114–S115.
15.
Meyere, Céline De, Frederiek Nuytens, Isabelle Parmentier, & Mathieu D’Hondt. (2020). Five-year single center experience of sacral neuromodulation for isolated fecal incontinence or fecal incontinence combined with low anterior resection syndrome. Techniques in Coloproctology. 24(9). 947–958. 15 indexed citations
16.
D’Hondt, Mathieu, et al.. (2019). Stepwise implementation of laparoscopic pancreatic surgery. Case series of a single centre's experience. International Journal of Surgery. 72. 137–143. 2 indexed citations
17.
D’Hondt, Mathieu, E. Willems, Isabelle Parmentier, et al.. (2019). Laparoscopic liver resection for liver tumours in proximity to major vasculature: A single-center comparative study. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 46(4). 539–547. 8 indexed citations
18.
D’Hondt, Mathieu, E. Willems, Isabelle Parmentier, et al.. (2018). Short term and oncologic outcomes of the first 250 laparoscopic liver resections performed by a laparoscopically trained liver surgeon. HPB. 20. S437–S437. 1 indexed citations
19.
D’Hondt, Mathieu, Joep Knol, Isabelle Parmentier, et al.. (2018). Laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy: single-center experience and technical aspects. Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery. 404(1). 21–29. 13 indexed citations
20.
Hecke, Ann Van, et al.. (2016). Pain Intensity in Hospitalized Adults. Nursing Research. 65(4). 290–300. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026