Céline Boisvenue
- Global and Planetary Change top 1%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 2%
- Atmospheric Science top 5%
- Ecology top 5%
- Environmental Engineering top 5%
- Co-authors
- Steven W. RunningThomas H. DeLucaWerner A. KurzJuha M. MetsarantaC. SmythEric T. NeilsonG. StinsonCindy Shaw
- Topics
- Forest ecology and management (8 papers)Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (8 papers)Fire effects on ecosystems (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Céline Boisvenue
20 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Global and Planetary Change 1.4k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 748
- Atmospheric Science 542
- Ecology 514
- Environmental Engineering 273
Countries citing papers authored by Céline Boisvenue
This map shows the geographic impact of Céline Boisvenue's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Céline Boisvenue with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Céline Boisvenue more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Céline Boisvenue
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Céline Boisvenue. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Céline Boisvenue. The network helps show where Céline Boisvenue may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Céline Boisvenue
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Céline Boisvenue. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Céline Boisvenue based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Céline Boisvenue. Céline Boisvenue is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 40 | |
| 5 | 27 | |
| 6 | 40 | |
| 7 | 19 | |
| 8 | 40 | |
| 9 | 30 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 44 | |
| 12 | 248 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 61 | |
| 15 | 181 | |
| 16 | 38 | |
| 17 | 242 | |
| 18 | Assessing forest productivity: satellite versus terrestrial data-driven estimates in Austria. | 1 |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 11 |
About Céline Boisvenue
Céline Boisvenue is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change and Ecological Modeling, having authored 21 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (8 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (8 papers) and Fire effects on ecosystems (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (1.4k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (748 citations) and Atmospheric Science (542 citations). Céline Boisvenue has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Steven W. Running, Thomas H. DeLuca, Werner A. Kurz, Juha M. Metsaranta, C. Smyth, Eric T. Neilson, G. Stinson, Cindy Shaw, Donald G. Leckie and A. Dyk. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Global Change Biology and Ecology Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.