Celia Wells
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Emergency Medicine top 10%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Co-authors
- Navneet KapurKeith HawtonOliver QuickDavid GunnellLesley SuttonOlive BennewithEmily KlinebergJ Cooper
- Topics
- Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses (8 papers)Legal Education and Practice Innovations (6 papers)Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Celia Wells
36 papers receiving 457 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Sociology and Political Science 176
- Clinical Psychology 131
- Emergency Medicine 93
- Strategy and Management 88
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 80
Countries citing papers authored by Celia Wells
This map shows the geographic impact of Celia Wells's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Celia Wells with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Celia Wells more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Celia Wells
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Celia Wells. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Celia Wells. The network helps show where Celia Wells may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Celia Wells
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Celia Wells. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Celia Wells based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Celia Wells. Celia Wells is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | CAN MODERN FOOTBALL MATCH DEMANDS BE TRANSLATED INTO NOVEL TRAINING AND TESTING MODES | 4 |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 58 | |
| 7 | 98 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 28 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | Corporate manslaughter : why does reform matter? | 2 |
| 13 | Corporate criminal liability – developments in Europe and beyond | 3 |
| 14 | Disasters: A challenge for the law | 8 |
| 15 | The millennium bug and corporate criminal liability | 1 |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | Trauma care since 1988. | 3 |
| 19 | Reconstructing criminal law : critical perspectives on crime and the criminal process | 7 |
| 20 | Thatcher's law | 4 |
About Celia Wells
Celia Wells is a scholar working on Law, Emergency Medicine and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 44 papers that have together received 528 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses (8 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (6 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (93 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (80 citations) and Health (53 citations). Celia Wells has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Navneet Kapur, Keith Hawton, Oliver Quick, David Gunnell, Lesley Sutton, Olive Bennewith, Emily Klineberg, J Cooper, Sarah Steeg and Sue Simkin. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Medicine, Journal of Affective Disorders and American Journal of Infection Control.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.