Celia S. Ponder
- Environmental Chemistry top 2%
- Chemistry and Chemical Engineering 3
- Process Chemistry and Technology top 10%
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
-
- Process Optimization and Integration 2
-
- Environmental Impact and Sustainability 1
-
- COVID-19 epidemiological studies 1
-
- Crystallization and Solubility Studies 1
-
- Healthcare Facilities Design and Sustainability 1
-
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography 1
-
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life 1
- Co-authors
- Concepción Jiménez‐GonzálezQuirinus B. BroxtermanJulie B. ManleyDavid J. C. ConstableMichael OvercashXing WangDonald J. KirwanYong Li
- Journals
- Chemical Society Reviews (1 paper)The Science of The Total Environment (1 paper)Crystal Growth & Design (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsBelgium
In The Last Decade
Celia S. Ponder
6 papers receiving 892 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Environmental Chemistry 483
- Process Chemistry and Technology 45
- Organic Chemistry 395
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 70
- Control and Systems Engineering 179
Countries citing papers authored by Celia S. Ponder
This map shows the geographic impact of Celia S. Ponder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Celia S. Ponder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Celia S. Ponder more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Celia S. Ponder
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Celia S. Ponder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Celia S. Ponder. The network helps show where Celia S. Ponder may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Celia S. Ponder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 267 | |
| 4 | Using the Right Green Yardstick: Why Process Mass Intensity Is Used in the Pharmaceutical Industry To Drive More Sustainable Processesbreakdown → | 2011 | 634 |
| 5 | 2009 | 18 | |
| 6 | Life cycle inventory analysis of medical textiles and their role in prevention of nosocomial infections | 2009 | 7 |
| 7 | 2004 | 15 |
About Celia S. Ponder
Celia S. Ponder is a scholar working on Environmental Chemistry, Modeling and Simulation and Urban Studies, having authored 7 papers that have together received 944 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemistry and Chemical Engineering (3 papers), Process Optimization and Integration (2 papers), Environmental Impact and Sustainability (1 paper), COVID-19 epidemiological studies (1 paper), Crystallization and Solubility Studies (1 paper), Healthcare Facilities Design and Sustainability (1 paper), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (1 paper) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Environmental Chemistry (483 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (45 citations) and Organic Chemistry (395 citations). Celia S. Ponder has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Concepción Jiménez‐González, Quirinus B. Broxterman, Julie B. Manley, David J. C. Constable, Michael Overcash, Xing Wang, Donald J. Kirwan, Yong Li, Desmond Curran and Evan Griffing. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Society Reviews, The Science of The Total Environment and Crystal Growth & Design.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.