Celia S. Ponder
- Environmental Chemistry top 2%
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Control and Systems Engineering top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Concepción Jiménez‐GonzálezQuirinus B. BroxtermanJulie B. ManleyDavid J. C. ConstableMichael OvercashXing WangDonald J. KirwanYong Li
- Topics
- Chemistry and Chemical Engineering (3 papers)Process Optimization and Integration (2 papers)Environmental Impact and Sustainability (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsBelgium
In The Last Decade
Celia S. Ponder
6 papers receiving 892 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Environmental Chemistry 483
- Organic Chemistry 395
- Biomedical Engineering 215
- Control and Systems Engineering 179
- Molecular Biology 135
Countries citing papers authored by Celia S. Ponder
This map shows the geographic impact of Celia S. Ponder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Celia S. Ponder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Celia S. Ponder more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Celia S. Ponder
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Celia S. Ponder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Celia S. Ponder. The network helps show where Celia S. Ponder may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Celia S. Ponder
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Celia S. Ponder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Celia S. Ponder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Celia S. Ponder. Celia S. Ponder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 267 | |
| 4 | Using the Right Green Yardstick: Why Process Mass Intensity Is Used in the Pharmaceutical Industry To Drive More Sustainable Processesbreakdown → | 634 |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | Life cycle inventory analysis of medical textiles and their role in prevention of nosocomial infections | 7 |
| 7 | 15 |
About Celia S. Ponder
Celia S. Ponder is a scholar working on Environmental Chemistry, Modeling and Simulation and Urban Studies, having authored 7 papers that have together received 944 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemistry and Chemical Engineering (3 papers), Process Optimization and Integration (2 papers) and Environmental Impact and Sustainability (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Environmental Chemistry (483 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (45 citations) and Organic Chemistry (395 citations). Celia S. Ponder has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Concepción Jiménez‐González, Quirinus B. Broxterman, Julie B. Manley, David J. C. Constable, Michael Overcash, Xing Wang, Donald J. Kirwan, Yong Li, Desmond Curran and Evan Griffing. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Society Reviews, The Science of The Total Environment and Crystal Growth & Design.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.