Celia Hughes

474 total citations
10 papers, 355 citations indexed

About

Celia Hughes is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Surgery and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Celia Hughes has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 355 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 2 papers in Surgery and 2 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Recurrent topics in Celia Hughes's work include Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (1 paper), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (1 paper) and Neurological diseases and metabolism (1 paper). Celia Hughes is often cited by papers focused on Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (1 paper), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (1 paper) and Neurological diseases and metabolism (1 paper). Celia Hughes collaborates with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and United States. Celia Hughes's co-authors include Niamh Murphy, Martina Ring, Cara Martin, John O’Leary, Orla Sheils, Bonnie L. King, E. McGuinness, Cynthia Heffron, Moataz M. Attallah and E. Weavers and has published in prestigious journals such as Acta Biomaterialia, Thorax and Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Celia Hughes

7 papers receiving 342 citations

Peers

Celia Hughes

MB

EPIDE

ONCOL

PRM

CR

Yongping Xue China

Philippe Birembaut France

Shruti Pandya India

Mercedes Bermúdez Mexico

Weizheng Ren China

Amir Zamani Iran

E Vairaktaris Greece

Zhouliang Wu China

Xiaoyue Cao China

Zhigui Li China

Yongping Xue China

Celia Hughes

196 ×1.2

MB

68 ×0.6

EPIDE

69 ×0.8

ONCOL

97 ×1.3

PRM

71 ×1.0

CR

Citations per year, relative to Celia Hughes Celia Hughes (= 1×) peers Yongping Xue

Countries citing papers authored by Celia Hughes

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Celia Hughes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Celia Hughes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Celia Hughes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Celia Hughes

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Celia Hughes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Celia Hughes. The network helps show where Celia Hughes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Celia Hughes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Celia Hughes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Celia Hughes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Celia Hughes. Celia Hughes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Hughes, Celia, Sinead A O’Rourke, Caitríona Lally, et al.. (2025). Mechano-immunomodulation of macrophages influences the regenerative environment of fracture healing through the regulation of angiogenesis and osteogenesis. Acta Biomaterialia. 200. 187–201. 1 indexed citations

2.

Whelan, Alison J., Celia Hughes, David O’Reilly, et al.. (2025). SALS-ing is believing: Determining dominant fibre orientation in pericardium using visual inspection and Small Angle Light Scattering (SALS). Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials. 172. 107173–107173.

3.

Khalid, Garba M., Celia Hughes, KH Kahler, et al.. (2025). 3D printing of dose-flexible crystalline solid dispersion tablets suitable for preclinical and first-in-human studies. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 114(10). 103943–103943.

4.

Hughes, Celia, et al.. (2024). Aortic valve leaflet assessment to inform novel bioinspired materials: Understanding the impact of collagen fibres on the tissue's mechanical behaviour. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials. 163. 106881–106881.

5.

Hughes, Celia, et al.. (2022). An investigation into patient-specific 3D printed titanium stents and the use of etching to overcome Selective Laser Melting design constraints. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials. 134. 105388–105388. 20 indexed citations

6.

Sulaiman, Imran, Elaine MacHale, Jansen N. Seheult, et al.. (2016). P208 Behavioural feed-back education intervention to enhance adherence in patients with severe uncontrolled asthma, a randomised clinical trial. Thorax. 71(Suppl 3). A198.1–A198. 1 indexed citations

7.

Hughes, Celia, et al.. (2006). Experimental fatigue performance of laser-formed components. Optics and Lasers in Engineering. 45(3). 423–430. 6 indexed citations

8.

Murphy, Niamh, Martina Ring, Cynthia Heffron, et al.. (2005). p16 ^INK4A , CDC6, and MCM5: predictive biomarkers in cervical preinvasive neoplasia and cervical cancer. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 58(5). 525–534. 186 indexed citations

9.

Hughes, Celia, et al.. (2005). Molecular pathology of prostate cancer. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 58(7). 673–684. 124 indexed citations

10.

Hanlon, Jennifer, et al.. (2002). Metallothionein in Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy. Journal of Comparative Pathology. 127(4). 280–289. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact