Célia Amorim‐Costa
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Co-authors
- João BernardesDiogo Ayres‐de‐CamposCristina SantosAntónia CostaHernâni GonçalvesJoana CruzWilliam T. SchnettlerAry L. Goldberger
- Topics
- Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (10 papers)Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (5 papers)Congenital Heart Disease Studies (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child HealthObstetrics and GynecologyEndocrine and Autonomic Systems
In The Last Decade
Célia Amorim‐Costa
17 papers receiving 252 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 158
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 77
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 65
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 53
- Biomedical Engineering 39
Countries citing papers authored by Célia Amorim‐Costa
This map shows the geographic impact of Célia Amorim‐Costa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Célia Amorim‐Costa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Célia Amorim‐Costa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Célia Amorim‐Costa
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Célia Amorim‐Costa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Célia Amorim‐Costa. The network helps show where Célia Amorim‐Costa may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Célia Amorim‐Costa
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Célia Amorim‐Costa. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Célia Amorim‐Costa based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Célia Amorim‐Costa. Célia Amorim‐Costa is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | 20 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 22 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 21 | |
| 17 | 80 |
About Célia Amorim‐Costa
Célia Amorim‐Costa is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 17 papers that have together received 257 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (10 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (5 papers) and Congenital Heart Disease Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (158 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (53 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (26 citations). Célia Amorim‐Costa has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, France and Italy. Frequent co-authors include João Bernardes, Diogo Ayres‐de‐Campos, Cristina Santos, Antónia Costa, Hernâni Gonçalves, Joana Cruz, William T. Schnettler, Ary L. Goldberger, Madalena D. Costa and Rita Gaio. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine and International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.