Celal Kılıt
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Surgery
- Epidemiology
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Co-authors
- Ersel OnratBasri AmasyalıMehmet Ali AstarcıoğluTaner ŞenDayımi KayaAtaç ÇelikMehmet MelekMacit Kalçık
- Topics
- Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (13 papers)Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (9 papers)Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (5 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaThe American Journal of CardiologyThe American Journal of Emergency Medicine
- Partner nations
- Türkiye
In The Last Decade
Celal Kılıt
44 papers receiving 341 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 178
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 64
- Surgery 61
- Epidemiology 43
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 41
Countries citing papers authored by Celal Kılıt
This map shows the geographic impact of Celal Kılıt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Celal Kılıt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Celal Kılıt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Celal Kılıt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Celal Kılıt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Celal Kılıt. The network helps show where Celal Kılıt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Celal Kılıt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Celal Kılıt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Celal Kılıt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Celal Kılıt. Celal Kılıt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 59 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | Heart Rate Turbulence Does Not Seem To Be A Good Predıctor in Long Qt Syndrome | 1 |
| 20 | 9 |
About Celal Kılıt
Celal Kılıt is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Internal Medicine and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 49 papers that have together received 355 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (13 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (9 papers) and Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (178 citations), Internal Medicine (22 citations) and Health (20 citations). Celal Kılıt has collaborated with scholars based in Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Ersel Onrat, Basri Amasyalı, Mehmet Ali Astarcıoğlu, Taner Şen, Dayımi Kaya, Ataç Çelik, Mehmet Melek, Macit Kalçık, Muhammed Oylumlu and Gökhan Gözübüyük. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The American Journal of Cardiology and The American Journal of Emergency Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.