C.E.E.M. van der Zee
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Physiology top 10%
- Nutrition and Dietetics
- Neurology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Willem Hendrik GispenJoost VerhaagenTheo HaggR. Gerritsen van der HoopEsther M.M. Van LieshoutWiljan HendriksW.H. GispenPieter J. Dederen
- Topics
- Nerve injury and regeneration (8 papers)Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (3 papers)Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsCanadaAustralia
In The Last Decade
C.E.E.M. van der Zee
17 papers receiving 590 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 242
- Molecular Biology 236
- Physiology 194
- Nutrition and Dietetics 77
- Neurology 76
Countries citing papers authored by C.E.E.M. van der Zee
This map shows the geographic impact of C.E.E.M. van der Zee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.E.E.M. van der Zee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.E.E.M. van der Zee more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C.E.E.M. van der Zee
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.E.E.M. van der Zee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.E.E.M. van der Zee. The network helps show where C.E.E.M. van der Zee may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C.E.E.M. van der Zee
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C.E.E.M. van der Zee. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C.E.E.M. van der Zee based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C.E.E.M. van der Zee. C.E.E.M. van der Zee is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 55 | |
| 3 | 151 | |
| 4 | 43 | |
| 5 | 37 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 45 | |
| 8 | 28 | |
| 9 | 29 | |
| 10 | 47 | |
| 11 | Peripheral nerve repair in the rat: functional and electrophysiological aspects | 3 |
| 12 | Factors promoting peripheral nerve repair: I. Recovery from peripheral nerve transection in the rat is accelerated by subcutaneous application of á-MSH | 4 |
| 13 | Melanocortins and peripheral nerve regeneration | 1 |
| 14 | 23 | |
| 15 | 34 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 87 |
About C.E.E.M. van der Zee
C.E.E.M. van der Zee is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Developmental Neuroscience and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 17 papers that have together received 608 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nerve injury and regeneration (8 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (3 papers) and Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (65 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (242 citations) and Neurology (76 citations). C.E.E.M. van der Zee has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Willem Hendrik Gispen, Joost Verhaagen, Theo Hagg, R. Gerritsen van der Hoop, Esther M.M. Van Lieshout, Wiljan Hendriks, W.H. Gispen, Pieter J. Dederen, F.G.I. Jennekens and P. Schotman. Their work appears in journals such as Diabetes, Neuroscience and Journal of Neurochemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.