Cedric Pugh
Impact in
- Urban Studies top 0.2%
- Urban and Rural Development Challenges
- Urban Planning and Governance
- Urbanization and City Planning
- Finance top 2%
- Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
- Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Papers in
- Finance 29
- Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism 29
-
- Urban and Rural Development Challenges 23
- Urban Planning and Governance 4
- Co-authors
- Peter N. Dean (1 shared paper)Andrew Parkin (1 shared paper)Clyde Manwell (1 shared paper)Eddie John (1 shared paper)Brian Martin (1 shared paper)Brian G. Field (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Cities (12 papers)Urban Studies (5 papers)Land Use Policy (3 papers)Habitat International (3 papers)Housing Studies (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaSingapore
In The Last Decade
Cedric Pugh
69 papers receiving 738 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Urban Studies 602
- Finance 406
- Economics and Econometrics 336
- Soil Science 59
- Political Science and International Relations 110
Countries citing papers authored by Cedric Pugh
This map shows the geographic impact of Cedric Pugh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cedric Pugh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cedric Pugh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cedric Pugh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cedric Pugh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cedric Pugh. The network helps show where Cedric Pugh may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Cedric Pugh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 76 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 83 | |
| 2 | 1993 | 77 | |
| 3 | 1994 | 58 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 56 | |
| 5 | 1994 | 38 | |
| 6 | 1995 | 38 | |
| 7 | 1997 | 37 | |
| 8 | 1997 | 30 | |
| 9 | Housing In Capitalist Societies | 1980 | 27 |
| 10 | 1996 | 24 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 22 | |
| 12 | 1996 | 21 | |
| 13 | 1991 | 21 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 21 | |
| 15 | Sustainable cities in developing countries : theory and practice at the millennium | 2000 | 18 |
| 16 | 1990 | 18 | |
| 17 | 1991 | 17 | |
| 18 | 1994 | 17 | |
| 19 | Housing and urbanisation : a study of India | 1990 | 16 |
| 20 | 1986 | 16 |
About Cedric Pugh
Cedric Pugh is a scholar working on Finance, Urban Studies, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 76 papers that have together received 939 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (29 papers), Urban and Rural Development Challenges (23 papers), Housing Market and Economics (13 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (4 papers), Land Rights and Reforms (4 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (3 papers), Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism (3 papers) and Socioeconomic Development in Asia (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (602 citations), Finance (406 citations), Economics and Econometrics (336 citations), Soil Science (59 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (110 citations). Cedric Pugh has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Peter N. Dean, Andrew Parkin, Clyde Manwell, Eddie John, Brian Martin and Brian G. Field. Their work appears in journals such as Cities, Urban Studies, Land Use Policy, Habitat International and Housing Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.