Cecil M. Lewis

108 total papers · 20.0k total citations
50 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Cecil M. Lewis is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics and Archeology. According to data from OpenAlex, Cecil M. Lewis has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Molecular Biology, 20 papers in Genetics and 11 papers in Archeology. Recurrent topics in Cecil M. Lewis's work include Gut microbiota and health (19 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (11 papers) and Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (7 papers). Cecil M. Lewis is often cited by papers focused on Gut microbiota and health (19 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (11 papers) and Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (7 papers). Cecil M. Lewis collaborates with scholars based in United States, Peru and Canada. Cecil M. Lewis's co-authors include Christina Warinner, Raúl Y. Tito, Krithivasan Sankaranarayanan, Andrew T. Ozga, Alexandra J. Obregón-Tito, Anne C. Stone, Morris W. Foster, Paul Spicer, Jessica L. Metcalf and Camilla Speller and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Communications and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Cecil M. Lewis

49 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Hit Papers

Subsistence strategies in... 2015 2026 2018 2022 2015 100 200 300

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Cecil M. Lewis 886 579 359 240 213 50 1.7k
Christina Adler 551 0.6× 629 1.1× 472 1.3× 316 1.3× 183 0.9× 27 1.8k
Laura S. Weyrich 687 0.8× 369 0.6× 204 0.6× 120 0.5× 545 2.6× 25 1.5k
Martin Sikora 514 0.6× 1.2k 2.0× 338 0.9× 389 1.6× 152 0.7× 54 2.3k
Kirsten I. Bos 725 0.8× 1.6k 2.8× 588 1.6× 345 1.4× 292 1.4× 34 2.3k
Stephanie L. Schnorr 1.3k 1.5× 220 0.4× 60 0.2× 60 0.3× 188 0.9× 30 1.9k
Ivan Nasidze 532 0.6× 697 1.2× 175 0.5× 30 0.1× 60 0.3× 23 1.4k
Sarah E. Schmedes 706 0.8× 773 1.3× 204 0.6× 74 0.3× 236 1.1× 23 1.3k
Maria A. Spyrou 287 0.3× 588 1.0× 206 0.6× 145 0.6× 111 0.5× 37 1.4k
Andaine Seguin‐Orlando 670 0.8× 488 0.8× 69 0.2× 145 0.6× 238 1.1× 29 1.4k
Thomas Nyambo 541 0.6× 1.3k 2.3× 191 0.5× 68 0.3× 47 0.2× 31 2.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Cecil M. Lewis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cecil M. Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cecil M. Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cecil M. Lewis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cecil M. Lewis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cecil M. Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cecil M. Lewis. The network helps show where Cecil M. Lewis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cecil M. Lewis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cecil M. Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cecil M. Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cecil M. Lewis. Cecil M. Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026