C.C. Hull

967 total citations
40 papers, 661 citations indexed

About

C.C. Hull is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, C.C. Hull has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 661 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Ophthalmology, 23 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 15 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in C.C. Hull's work include Corneal surgery and disorders (18 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (15 papers) and Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (13 papers). C.C. Hull is often cited by papers focused on Corneal surgery and disorders (18 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (15 papers) and Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (13 papers). C.C. Hull collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and Australia. C.C. Hull's co-authors include John G Lawrenson, Laura E. Downie, Miles Stanford, J.F. Boyce, John Marshall, Lucia Pelosini, Dominic McHugh, David O’Brart, Radhika Tandon and Edward Lee and has published in prestigious journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Vision Research and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.

In The Last Decade

C.C. Hull

37 papers receiving 632 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
C.C. Hull United Kingdom 12 423 335 159 117 43 40 661
Hun-Ju Yu Taiwan 11 609 1.4× 544 1.6× 138 0.9× 605 5.2× 24 0.6× 26 886
Juan Murube Spain 18 614 1.5× 531 1.6× 843 5.3× 69 0.6× 19 0.4× 92 1.2k
Kazuo Tsubota Japan 16 533 1.3× 278 0.8× 676 4.3× 47 0.4× 36 0.8× 25 922
Helen Owens United States 18 586 1.4× 377 1.1× 344 2.2× 362 3.1× 35 0.8× 48 943
Por‐Tying Hung Taiwan 14 794 1.9× 832 2.5× 78 0.5× 689 5.9× 35 0.8× 34 1.1k
Jaspreet Sukhija India 17 389 0.9× 548 1.6× 120 0.8× 214 1.8× 60 1.4× 81 831
Zaina Al-Mohtaseb United States 17 476 1.1× 562 1.7× 165 1.0× 303 2.6× 28 0.7× 61 910
Yabo Yang China 17 688 1.6× 537 1.6× 195 1.2× 428 3.7× 5 0.1× 36 855
Ana Sánchez‐Cano Spain 17 373 0.9× 478 1.4× 24 0.2× 90 0.8× 11 0.3× 82 782
Martin Emesz Austria 12 284 0.7× 450 1.3× 54 0.3× 315 2.7× 24 0.6× 31 615

Countries citing papers authored by C.C. Hull

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C.C. Hull's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.C. Hull with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.C. Hull more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C.C. Hull

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.C. Hull. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.C. Hull. The network helps show where C.C. Hull may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of C.C. Hull

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C.C. Hull. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C.C. Hull based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C.C. Hull. C.C. Hull is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Low, Sancy, Scott Robbie, Christopher J. Hammond, et al.. (2024). ‘Off the shelf’ toric intraocular lenses to allow better access in public healthcare: a randomised control study. Eye. 38(13). 2651–2652. 1 indexed citations
2.
Hull, C.C., et al.. (2023). Corneal astigmatic outcomes after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery combined with surface penetrating arcuate keratotomies. International Journal of Ophthalmology. 16(7). 1084–1092. 3 indexed citations
4.
Vaddavalli, Pravin K., et al.. (2023). Suprathreshold contrast perception of resolvable high spatial frequencies remain intact in keratoconus. Vision Research. 212. 108310–108310. 1 indexed citations
5.
O’Brart, David, et al.. (2020). Visual and refractive outcomes and glistenings occurrence after implantation of 2 hydrophobic acrylic aspheric monofocal IOLs. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 46(7). 986–994. 24 indexed citations
6.
Chen, Ye, Jun Wang, Yin Zhao, et al.. (2019). Small core FBG-based temperature compensated ‘smart’ contact lens for effective intraocular pressure measurement. Measurement Sensors. 1. 100001–100001. 2 indexed citations
7.
Lawrenson, John G, C.C. Hull, & Laura E. Downie. (2017). The effect of blue‐light blocking spectacle lenses on visual performance, macular health and the sleep‐wake cycle: a systematic review of the literature. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 37(6). 644–654. 107 indexed citations
8.
Tandon, Radhika, et al.. (2008). Visual rehabilitation in end-stage inflammatory ocular surface disease with the osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis: results from the UK. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 92(9). 1211–1217. 76 indexed citations
9.
Brittain, Christopher, et al.. (2007). Changes in Scanning Laser Polarimetry Before and After Laser Capsulotomy for Posterior Capsular Opacification. Journal of Glaucoma. 16(1). 112–116. 5 indexed citations
10.
Hull, C.C., et al.. (2004). Functional Vision after Osteo–odonto–keratoprosthesis (OOKP). Our experience with different cylinder designs.. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 45(13). 4614–4614. 1 indexed citations
11.
Hull, C.C., et al.. (2003). Fourier analysis of induced irregular astigmatism. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 29(9). 1709–1717. 14 indexed citations
12.
Hull, C.C., et al.. (2002). Digital imaging system for assessing posterior capsular opacification: a preliminary report. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 22(6). 581–581.
13.
Hull, C.C., et al.. (2000). Optical cylinder designs to increase the field of vision in the osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis. Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 238(12). 1002–1008. 18 indexed citations
14.
Hull, C.C., et al.. (2000). Optical Fourier filtering for whole lens assessment of progressive power lenses. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 20(4). 281–289. 4 indexed citations
15.
Hull, C.C., et al.. (1999). Image quality in polypseudophakia for extremely short eyes. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 83(6). 656–663. 17 indexed citations
16.
Hull, C.C.. (1999). Loss of resolution in a corneal topography system. Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 237(10). 800–805. 4 indexed citations
17.
Hull, C.C.. (1996). Determination of the total attenuation coefficient for six contact lens materials using the Beer—Lambert law. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 16(2). 150–157. 11 indexed citations
18.
Hull, C.C., et al.. (1996). Determination of the total attenuation coefficient for six contact lens materials using the Beer–Lambert law. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 16(2). 150–157. 4 indexed citations
19.
Woodward, E. Geoffrey, et al.. (1995). A novel approach to measuring the wettability of rigid contact lenses. Mass measurement of the adherent liquid on the rigid lens surface (1). Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 15(6). 575–583. 1 indexed citations
20.
Woodward, E. Geoffrey, et al.. (1995). Surface wettability and hydrophilicity of soft contact lens materials, before and after wear. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 15(5). 529–532. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026