Catrin Strobel

552 citations
9 papers · 458 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

    • Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty 2
    • Pancreatic function and diabetes 1
    • Bone Tissue Engineering Materials 4
    • 3D Printing in Biomedical Research 2

Catrin Strobel

9 papers receiving 447 citations

Peers

Catrin Strobel
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Urology 38
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 46
  • Surgery 205
  • Biomedical Engineering 158
  • Biomaterials 47
Replace Helen Tsao with:
Helen Tsao United States
Yuko Sai Japan
Muzhe Li China
Hiroyuki Tsukazaki Japan
Glenda J. Pettway United States
Lijin Zou China
Fernando H. Lojudice Brazil
Rong Nie China
Shigeki Hijikata Japan
Enyi Huang China
Catrin Strobel relative to Helen Tsao United States Helen Tsao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Helen Tsao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Catrin Strobel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Catrin Strobel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catrin Strobel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catrin Strobel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Catrin Strobel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catrin Strobel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catrin Strobel. The network helps show where Catrin Strobel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Catrin Strobel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Catrin Strobel Line = papers co-authored together Catrin Strobel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2007143
2 200884
3 201173
4 201146
5 201442
6 200239
7 201121
8 20118
9 20102

About Catrin Strobel

Catrin Strobel is a scholar working on Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Epidemiology, Molecular Biology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 9 papers that have together received 458 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (4 papers), Polymer Surface Interaction Studies (2 papers), Bone fractures and treatments (2 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (2 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (2 papers), Antimicrobial agents and applications (1 paper), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (1 paper) and Pancreatic function and diabetes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (38 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (46 citations), Surgery (205 citations), Biomedical Engineering (158 citations) and Biomaterials (47 citations). Catrin Strobel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Britt Wildemann, Gerhard Schmidmaier, P. Schwabe, Maria Wartenberg, Heinrich Sauer, Sabine S. Lange, Anke Kadow‐Romacker, Nicole Bormann, M Fassbender and Susann Minkwitz. Their work appears in journals such as Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, Injury, Journal of Cell Science, Journal of Controlled Release and International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact