Catherine L. Hanks

546 total citations
37 papers, 419 citations indexed

About

Catherine L. Hanks is a scholar working on Mechanics of Materials, Geophysics and Geology. According to data from OpenAlex, Catherine L. Hanks has authored 37 papers receiving a total of 419 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Mechanics of Materials, 19 papers in Geophysics and 14 papers in Geology. Recurrent topics in Catherine L. Hanks's work include Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (19 papers), Geological Studies and Exploration (14 papers) and Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis (12 papers). Catherine L. Hanks is often cited by papers focused on Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (19 papers), Geological Studies and Exploration (14 papers) and Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis (12 papers). Catherine L. Hanks collaborates with scholars based in United States, British Virgin Islands and Netherlands. Catherine L. Hanks's co-authors include Wesley K. Wallace, Thomas M. Parris, Mohabbat Ahmadi, Laura Read, Paul O’Sullivan, Soroush Mokhtari, Kaveh Madani, Jerry L. Jensen, Paul J. McCarthy and Paul F. Green and has published in prestigious journals such as Geology, Energy and Geological Society of America Bulletin.

In The Last Decade

Catherine L. Hanks

36 papers receiving 373 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Catherine L. Hanks United States 13 173 172 141 125 86 37 419
Paul Williamson United Kingdom 12 172 1.0× 61 0.4× 51 0.4× 61 0.5× 65 0.8× 39 425
Asam Farid Pakistan 12 227 1.3× 146 0.8× 77 0.5× 132 1.1× 60 0.7× 26 354
Simon Virgo Germany 12 217 1.3× 204 1.2× 92 0.7× 70 0.6× 29 0.3× 19 399
Michael H. Trippi United States 10 60 0.3× 246 1.4× 73 0.5× 89 0.7× 36 0.4× 37 355
I.J. Andrews United Kingdom 9 111 0.6× 196 1.1× 78 0.6× 39 0.3× 79 0.9× 15 356
Duan Wei China 10 76 0.4× 188 1.1× 88 0.6× 98 0.8× 39 0.5× 23 324
Julian Strand Australia 11 200 1.2× 181 1.1× 73 0.5× 91 0.7× 56 0.7× 27 418
Vincent Roche Ireland 13 371 2.1× 131 0.8× 87 0.6× 64 0.5× 47 0.5× 28 455
Scott Mildren Australia 15 403 2.3× 272 1.6× 311 2.2× 234 1.9× 75 0.9× 29 607
Mohammed Benssaou Morocco 9 131 0.8× 137 0.8× 99 0.7× 63 0.5× 21 0.2× 17 306

Countries citing papers authored by Catherine L. Hanks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine L. Hanks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine L. Hanks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine L. Hanks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine L. Hanks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine L. Hanks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine L. Hanks. The network helps show where Catherine L. Hanks may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Catherine L. Hanks

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Catherine L. Hanks. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Catherine L. Hanks based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Catherine L. Hanks. Catherine L. Hanks is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hanks, Catherine L., et al.. (2018). Decline Curve Analysis: A Comparative Study of Proposed Models Using Improved Residual Functions. Journal of Petroleum & Environmental Biotechnology. 9(1). 16 indexed citations
2.
Hanks, Catherine L., et al.. (2017). In situ stress variations associated with regional changes in tectonic setting, northeastern Brooks Range and eastern North Slope of Alaska. AAPG Bulletin. 101(3). 343–360. 16 indexed citations
3.
Hanks, Catherine L., et al.. (2016). Using Improved Decline Curve Models for Production Forecasts in Unconventional Reservoirs. SPE Eastern Regional Meeting. 12 indexed citations
4.
Read, Laura, Kaveh Madani, Soroush Mokhtari, & Catherine L. Hanks. (2016). Stakeholder-driven multi-attribute analysis for energy project selection under uncertainty. Energy. 119. 744–753. 20 indexed citations
6.
Hauber, Roxanne Pickett, et al.. (2015). Mitigating procedural pain during venipuncture in a pediatric population: A randomized factorial study. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 52(10). 1553–1564. 20 indexed citations
7.
Hanks, Catherine L., et al.. (2014). Tectono-thermal History of the Southern Nenana Basin, Interior Alaska: Implications for Conventional and Unconventional Hydrocarbon Exploration. AGUFM. 2014. 1 indexed citations
8.
Hanks, Catherine L., et al.. (2014). Ultramafic and Mafic Rock Distributions in Central Alaska and Implications for CO2 Sequestration. Natural Resources Research. 24(3). 349–368. 1 indexed citations
10.
Duncan, Alec J., Catherine L. Hanks, Wesley K. Wallace, Paul O’Sullivan, & Thomas M. Parris. (2012). An integrated model of the structural evolution of the central Brooks Range foothills, Alaska, using structural geometry, fracture distribution, geochronology, and microthermometry. AAPG Bulletin. 96(12). 2245–2274. 9 indexed citations
11.
Hanks, Catherine L., et al.. (2012). Can A Shallow Frozen Reservoir Be Successfully Exploited? A Predevelopment Case Study Of The Umiat Oil Field, Northern Alaska. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. 4 indexed citations
12.
Hanks, Catherine L., et al.. (2008). Evolving mechanical stratigraphy during detachment folding. Journal of Structural Geology. 30(5). 548–564. 30 indexed citations
13.
Kaviani, Danial, et al.. (2008). The Application of Artificial Neural Networks With Small Data Sets: An Example for Analysis of Fracture Spacing in the Lisburne Formation, Northeastern Alaska. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering. 11(3). 598–605. 14 indexed citations
14.
Jensen, Jerry L., et al.. (2008). Neural Network Modeling with Sparse Datasets. Petroleum Science and Technology. 26(5). 545–561. 2 indexed citations
15.
Hanks, Catherine L., et al.. (2007). Introducing the Geosciences to Alaska Natives via the Rural Alaska Honors Institute (RAHI). Journal of Geoscience Education. 55(6). 507–513. 12 indexed citations
16.
Kaviani, Danial, et al.. (2006). The Application of Artificial Neural Networks With Small Data Sets: AnExample for Analysis of Fracture Spacing in the Lisburne Formation,Northeastern Alaska. Proceedings of SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. 1 indexed citations
18.
Hanks, Catherine L., et al.. (2001). The relationship between fracturing, asymmetric folding, and normal faulting in Lisburne Group carbonates: West Porcupine Lake Valley, northeastern Brooks Range, Alaska - Abstract. 36. 2 indexed citations
19.
O’Sullivan, Paul, Catherine L. Hanks, Wesley K. Wallace, & Paul F. Green. (1995). Multiple episodes of Cenozoic denudation in the northeastern Brooks Range: fission-track data from the Okpilak batholith, Alaska. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences. 32(8). 1106–1118. 18 indexed citations
20.
Hanks, Catherine L.. (1993). The Cenozoic structural evolution of a fold-and-thrust belt, northeastern Brooks Range, Alaska. Geological Society of America Bulletin. 105(3). 287–305. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026