Catherine L. Burton

634 total citations
7 papers, 492 citations indexed

About

Catherine L. Burton is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Catherine L. Burton has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 492 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, 4 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 2 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Catherine L. Burton's work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (4 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers). Catherine L. Burton is often cited by papers focused on Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (4 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers). Catherine L. Burton collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Catherine L. Burton's co-authors include Esther Strauss, David F. Hultsch, Michael A. Hunter, David Bunce, David B. Coppel, Joseph Becker and Margaret Crossley and has published in prestigious journals such as Cognitive Therapy and Research, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology and Gerontology.

In The Last Decade

Catherine L. Burton

7 papers receiving 469 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Catherine L. Burton Canada	6	289	126	77	76	59	7	492
Emylucy Martins Paiva Paradela Brazil	8	240 0.8×	115 0.9×	34 0.4×	36 0.5×	129 2.2×	13	545
Carol Opdebeeck United Kingdom	10	303 1.0×	136 1.1×	91 1.2×	99 1.3×	74 1.3×	19	554
Fanny Matharan France	10	246 0.9×	85 0.7×	60 0.8×	44 0.6×	91 1.5×	16	568
M. Dolores Calero Spain	12	156 0.5×	119 0.9×	54 0.7×	53 0.7×	34 0.6×	39	398
Jean Bouisson France	13	174 0.6×	59 0.5×	43 0.6×	122 1.6×	104 1.8×	34	471
Emilie I. Franchow United States	12	155 0.5×	117 0.9×	35 0.5×	125 1.6×	28 0.5×	15	439
Meagan T. Farrell United States	15	273 0.9×	248 2.0×	39 0.5×	86 1.1×	73 1.2×	40	641
C. Albert Colomer Spain	5	118 0.4×	55 0.4×	40 0.5×	38 0.5×	79 1.3×	7	361
Paul L. Merrick New Zealand	8	197 0.7×	80 0.6×	39 0.5×	115 1.5×	48 0.8×	21	381
Cristina Aguado Taberné Spain	6	112 0.4×	55 0.4×	40 0.5×	36 0.5×	79 1.3×	10	380

Countries citing papers authored by Catherine L. Burton

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine L. Burton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine L. Burton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine L. Burton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine L. Burton

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine L. Burton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine L. Burton. The network helps show where Catherine L. Burton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Catherine L. Burton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Catherine L. Burton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Catherine L. Burton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Catherine L. Burton. Catherine L. Burton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

Burton, Catherine L., Esther Strauss, David F. Hultsch, & Michael A. Hunter. (2009). The Relationship between Everyday Problem Solving and Inconsistency in Reaction Time in Older Adults. Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition. 16(5). 607–632. 36 indexed citations

Burton, Catherine L., Esther Strauss, David Bunce, Michael A. Hunter, & David F. Hultsch. (2009). Functional Abilities in Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment. Gerontology. 55(5). 570–581. 142 indexed citations

Burton, Catherine L., Esther Strauss, David F. Hultsch, & Michael A. Hunter. (2006). Cognitive Functioning and Everyday Problem Solving in Older Adults. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 20(3). 432–452. 104 indexed citations

Burton, Catherine L., et al.. (2006). Intraindividual Variability as a Marker of Neurological Dysfunction: A Comparison of Alzheimer's Disease and Parkinson's Disease. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 28(1). 67–83. 122 indexed citations

Burton, Catherine L. & Margaret Crossley. (2003). Examining the Utility of the Saskatchewan Mood Inventory for Individuals with Memory Loss. Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement. 22(3). 297–310. 3 indexed citations

Burton, Catherine L., David F. Hultsch, Esther Strauss, & Michael A. Hunter. (2002). Intraindividual Variability in Physical and Emotional Functioning: Comparison of Adults With Traumatic Brain Injuries and Healthy Adults. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 16(3). 264–279. 28 indexed citations

Coppel, David B., et al.. (1985). Relationships of cognitions associated with coping reactions to depression in spousal caregivers of Alzheimer's disease patients. Cognitive Therapy and Research. 9(3). 253–266. 57 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact