Catherine Gray Deering
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Education top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Topics
- Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (3 papers)Child Therapy and Development (3 papers)Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers)
- Journals
- Clinical Psychology ReviewComprehensive PsychiatryAustralian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
- Partner nations
- United StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Catherine Gray Deering
27 papers receiving 591 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Clinical Psychology 467
- Social Psychology 137
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 93
- Education 87
- General Health Professions 68
Countries citing papers authored by Catherine Gray Deering
This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine Gray Deering's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine Gray Deering with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine Gray Deering more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine Gray Deering
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine Gray Deering. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine Gray Deering. The network helps show where Catherine Gray Deering may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Catherine Gray Deering
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Catherine Gray Deering. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Catherine Gray Deering based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Catherine Gray Deering. Catherine Gray Deering is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Managing Disruptive Behaviour in the Classroom. | 4 |
| 2 | 17 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 37 | |
| 6 | To Speak or not To Speak | 0 |
| 7 | 26 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 115 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 31 | |
| 16 | 56 | |
| 17 | 106 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 23 |
About Catherine Gray Deering
Catherine Gray Deering is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Health Information Management and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 28 papers that have together received 663 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (3 papers), Child Therapy and Development (3 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (467 citations), Social Psychology (137 citations) and Speech and Hearing (31 citations). Catherine Gray Deering has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Gary R. Racusin, Nadine J. Kaslow, Susan G. Glover, Renato D. Alarcón and David J. Ready. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Psychology Review, Comprehensive Psychiatry and Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.