Catherine E. King

698 total citations
37 papers, 451 citations indexed

About

Catherine E. King is a scholar working on Ecology, Genetics and Parasitology. According to data from OpenAlex, Catherine E. King has authored 37 papers receiving a total of 451 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Ecology, 9 papers in Genetics and 8 papers in Parasitology. Recurrent topics in Catherine E. King's work include Avian ecology and behavior (11 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (10 papers) and Bird parasitology and diseases (8 papers). Catherine E. King is often cited by papers focused on Avian ecology and behavior (11 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (10 papers) and Bird parasitology and diseases (8 papers). Catherine E. King collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Catherine E. King's co-authors include Elina Hyppönen, Ang Zhou, Anwar Mulugeta, Lynn E. DeLisi, Steven D. Targum, Søren Saxmose Nielsen, Mads F. Bertelsen, Michael D. Wiese, Rachael Miller and Frank H. H. King and has published in prestigious journals such as The British Journal of Psychiatry, Molecular Psychiatry and Pharmacological Research.

In The Last Decade

Catherine E. King

32 papers receiving 402 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Catherine E. King Australia 13 124 111 100 83 47 37 451
Nicolaas H. Fourie United States 16 182 1.5× 102 0.9× 71 0.7× 58 0.7× 24 0.5× 29 768
Kirsty J. MacLeod United States 13 192 1.5× 53 0.5× 59 0.6× 209 2.5× 7 0.1× 31 530
Paul Williams United States 14 65 0.5× 17 0.2× 154 1.5× 79 1.0× 51 1.1× 36 878
C. Gabrion France 19 437 3.5× 139 1.3× 99 1.0× 93 1.1× 234 5.0× 52 764
Andrew Overall United Kingdom 14 194 1.6× 27 0.2× 368 3.7× 182 2.2× 10 0.2× 32 727
Eija Eloranta Finland 13 185 1.5× 61 0.5× 127 1.3× 37 0.4× 15 0.3× 32 561
G R Flannery Australia 16 37 0.3× 33 0.3× 29 0.3× 57 0.7× 44 0.9× 35 656
M.C.J. Paris Australia 19 198 1.6× 171 1.5× 224 2.2× 90 1.1× 8 0.2× 51 847
Laura Harper United States 8 51 0.4× 86 0.8× 60 0.6× 49 0.6× 4 0.1× 14 369
Win Htut Finland 12 221 1.8× 183 1.6× 134 1.3× 99 1.2× 11 0.2× 30 401

Countries citing papers authored by Catherine E. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine E. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine E. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine E. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine E. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine E. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine E. King. The network helps show where Catherine E. King may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Catherine E. King

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Catherine E. King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Catherine E. King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Catherine E. King. Catherine E. King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Brereton, James Edward, et al.. (2024). A preliminary global investigation into potential impacts on successful captive breeding for two species of Rhyticeros hornbill. Zoo Biology. 43(5). 405–415. 2 indexed citations
2.
Mooney, Andrew, et al.. (2023). Flock size and structure influence reproductive success in four species of flamingo in 540 captive populations worldwide. Zoo Biology. 42(3). 343–356. 5 indexed citations
3.
Hopkins, Ashley M., Catherine E. King, Ahmad Y. Abuhelwa, et al.. (2022). Female reproductive status and exogenous sex hormone use in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with tocilizumab and csDMARDs. Lara D. Veeken. 62(2). 583–595. 4 indexed citations
4.
King, Catherine E., et al.. (2021). A review of liquid biopsy as a tool to assess epigenetic, cfDNA and miRNA variability as methotrexate response predictors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Pharmacological Research. 173. 105887–105887. 22 indexed citations
5.
King, Catherine E., et al.. (2020). Mendelian randomization case-control PheWAS in UK Biobank shows evidence of causality for smoking intensity in 28 distinct clinical conditions. EClinicalMedicine. 26. 100488–100488. 12 indexed citations
6.
Mulugeta, Anwar, Ang Zhou, Catherine E. King, & Elina Hyppönen. (2019). Association between major depressive disorder and multiple disease outcomes: a phenome-wide Mendelian randomisation study in the UK Biobank. Molecular Psychiatry. 25(7). 1469–1476. 63 indexed citations
7.
Miller, Rachael & Catherine E. King. (2013). Husbandry training, using positive reinforcement techniques, for Marabou stork Leptoptilos crumeniferus at Edinburgh Zoo. International Zoo Yearbook. 47(1). 171–180. 11 indexed citations
8.
Nielsen, Søren Saxmose, et al.. (2012). RISK FACTORS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF FOOT LESIONS IN CAPTIVE FLAMINGOS (PHOENICOPTERIDAE). Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine. 43(4). 744–749. 17 indexed citations
9.
King, Catherine E., et al.. (2012). Management and husbandry guidelines for Shoebills Balaeniceps rex in captivity. International Zoo Yearbook. 47(1). 181–189. 3 indexed citations
10.
Nielsen, Søren Saxmose, et al.. (2010). Classification and Prevalence of Foot Lesions in Captive Flamingos (Phoenicopteridae). Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine. 41(1). 44–49. 31 indexed citations
11.
King, Catherine E.. (2000). Captive Flamingo Populations and Opportunities for Research in Zoos. Waterbirds. 23. 142–142. 13 indexed citations
12.
King, Catherine E., et al.. (2000). Longevity records for Psittaciformes in captivity. International Zoo Yearbook. 37(1). 299–316. 52 indexed citations
13.
Kahana, Eva, J. M. Kinney, Boaz Kahana, et al.. (1996). Predictors of Attitudes toward Three Target Groups of Elderly Persons. Journal of Aging and Health. 8(1). 27–53. 23 indexed citations
14.
King, Catherine E.. (1994). Black stork Ciconia nigra: management in Europe. International Zoo Yearbook. 33(1). 49–54. 1 indexed citations
15.
King, Catherine E.. (1994). Management and research implications of selected behaviours in a mixed colony of flamingos at Rotterdam Zoo. International Zoo Yearbook. 33(1). 103–113. 8 indexed citations
16.
King, Catherine E. & Malcolm C. Coulter. (1989). Status of storks in zoos: 1987 world survey. International Zoo Yearbook. 28(1). 225–229. 4 indexed citations
17.
King, Frank H. H., et al.. (1988). The Hongkong Bank in the period of imperialism and war, 1895-1918 : Wayfoong, the focus of wealth. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 5 indexed citations
18.
King, Frank H. H., et al.. (1988). The Hongkong Bank between the wars and the bank interned, 1919-1945 : return from grandeur. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 3 indexed citations
19.
King, Catherine E., et al.. (1987). The Hongkong Bank in late imperial China 1864-1902 : on an even keel. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 1. 7 indexed citations
20.
DeLisi, Lynn E., Catherine E. King, & Steven D. Targum. (1984). Serum Immunoglobulin Concentrations in Patients Admitted to an Acute Psychiatric In-patient Service. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 145(6). 661–665. 39 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026