Catherine Crawford

1.0k total citations
14 papers, 120 citations indexed

About

Catherine Crawford is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Clinical Psychology and Cancer Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Catherine Crawford has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 120 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Molecular Biology, 3 papers in Clinical Psychology and 3 papers in Cancer Research. Recurrent topics in Catherine Crawford's work include Calpain Protease Function and Regulation (2 papers), NF-κB Signaling Pathways (2 papers) and RNA Research and Splicing (2 papers). Catherine Crawford is often cited by papers focused on Calpain Protease Function and Regulation (2 papers), NF-κB Signaling Pathways (2 papers) and RNA Research and Splicing (2 papers). Catherine Crawford collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Slovakia. Catherine Crawford's co-authors include Mark Pearson, Anthony C. Willis, Piers C. Emson, Wipawan Thangnipon, Norihiko Iwamoto, Mary Gregoriou, Heidi G. Sutherland, Wendy A. Bickmore, D. Nicholas Bateman and Euan A. Sandilands and has published in prestigious journals such as Cancer Research, Brain Research and Journal of Cell Science.

In The Last Decade

Catherine Crawford

10 papers receiving 114 citations

Peers

Catherine Crawford
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Molecular Biology 52
  • Cell Biology 51
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 31
  • Physiology 19
  • Genetics 12
Stacey Drabic United States
Tanuja Chaudhary United States
Elisenda Cortès‐Saladelafont Spain
Iwona Czaban Poland
Ramona Salvarinova Canada
Corinne Gemperle-Britschgi Switzerland
Cinzia Caporale Italy
Morgan Sturgeon United States
Karen Young United States
Miriam Döcker Germany
Stacey Drabic United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Catherine Crawford
Catherine Crawford · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Catherine Crawford
Catherine Crawford · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Catherine Crawford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine Crawford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine Crawford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine Crawford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine Crawford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine Crawford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine Crawford. The network helps show where Catherine Crawford may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Catherine Crawford

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Catherine Crawford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Catherine Crawford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Catherine Crawford. Catherine Crawford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2 0
3 1
4 17
5
United Kingdom drug situation. Focal Point annual report 2016.
6
6 1
7 2
8 2
9 1
10
16
11
If you really want to hear about it : writers on J.D. Salinger and his work
1
12 1
13 35
14 36

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026