Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Household food waste: Drivers and potential intervention points for design – An extensive review
This map shows the geographic impact of Casper Boks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Casper Boks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Casper Boks more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Casper Boks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Casper Boks. The network helps show where Casper Boks may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Casper Boks
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Casper Boks.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Casper Boks based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Casper Boks. Casper Boks is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Boks, Casper, et al.. (2015). WHAT DESIGN STUDENTS THINK ARE HOT TOPICS; AN ANALYSIS OF 20+ YEARS OF INDUSTRIAL DESIGN MASTER PROJECTS. 318–323.1 indexed citations
7.
Boks, Casper, et al.. (2012). Design for Sustainable Behaviour in Design Education. 611–616.1 indexed citations
8.
Boks, Casper, et al.. (2011). The Great Challenge, Staging the Design Education for the next 20 Years. 429–433.1 indexed citations
9.
Boks, Casper, et al.. (2011). Entrepreneurship in Future Design Education. 53–58.
10.
Boks, Casper, et al.. (2011). Obtrusiveness and design for sustainable behaviour.1 indexed citations
11.
Laitala, Kirsi & Casper Boks. (2010). Clothing design for promoting sustainable use: Social and technical durability. Research Repository (Delft University of Technology).1 indexed citations
12.
Boks, Casper, et al.. (2010). CULTURAL CUSTOMIZATION OF MOBILE COMMUNICATION DEVICES' COMPONENTS. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University). 137–146.2 indexed citations
13.
Boks, Casper, et al.. (2010). When to apply different design for sustainable behaviour strategies. Research Repository (Delft University of Technology).19 indexed citations
14.
Verhulst, Elli & Casper Boks. (2010). The role of human factors in the adoption of sustainable design criteria in business. Research Repository (Delft University of Technology).2 indexed citations
15.
Wever, Renee, et al.. (2009). Sustainability in design engineering education: experiences in Northern Europe. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).3 indexed citations
16.
Boks, Casper & Tim C. McAloone. (2008). Successive Transitions in Ecodesign: From the Stopwatch Era to Technology Transfer and Commercialisation. 142.1 indexed citations
17.
Bright, Ryan M. & Casper Boks. (2008). Mapping LCA Use in Ecodesign: Engineer, Designer, and LCA-specialist Perspectives. 118.1 indexed citations
Boks, Casper & Ab Stevels. (2002). Multiple Environmental Benchmark Data Supporting Ecodesign in Both Industry and Academia. 1299–1304.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.