Caroline Stem

1.5k total citations
8 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Caroline Stem is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, Caroline Stem has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Strategy and Management, 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 3 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in Caroline Stem's work include Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research (3 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (2 papers). Caroline Stem is often cited by papers focused on Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research (3 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (2 papers). Caroline Stem collaborates with scholars based in United States and Australia. Caroline Stem's co-authors include Richard Margoluis, Nick Salafsky, Marcia Brown, James P. Lassoie, David R. Lee, John Schelhas, Arlyne Johnson, Aileen Lee, Carly N. Cook and Mark W. Schwartz and has published in prestigious journals such as Conservation Biology, Ecology and Society and Journal of Sustainable Tourism.

In The Last Decade

Caroline Stem

8 papers receiving 879 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Caroline Stem United States	7	465	312	280	223	209	8	1.0k
Guangming He United States	16	792 1.7×	341 1.1×	283 1.0×	241 1.1×	328 1.6×	22	1.4k
Dale J. Blahna United States	22	725 1.6×	221 0.7×	377 1.3×	307 1.4×	245 1.2×	61	1.5k
Nabin Baral United States	20	493 1.1×	317 1.0×	410 1.5×	226 1.0×	415 2.0×	44	1.1k
Yali Wen China	21	681 1.5×	220 0.7×	284 1.0×	274 1.2×	257 1.2×	113	1.3k
Jeremy Brooks United States	17	625 1.3×	335 1.1×	356 1.3×	327 1.5×	226 1.1×	40	1.3k
Alexander N. Songorwa Tanzania	10	822 1.8×	459 1.5×	219 0.8×	351 1.6×	256 1.2×	14	1.3k
Michael P. Wells United States	11	825 1.8×	309 1.0×	309 1.1×	255 1.1×	342 1.6×	20	1.2k
Adrián Phillips United Kingdom	16	601 1.3×	257 0.8×	417 1.5×	301 1.3×	284 1.4×	39	1.3k
Arielle Levine United States	18	563 1.2×	574 1.8×	252 0.9×	475 2.1×	82 0.4×	54	1.3k
Julie Urquhart United Kingdom	23	459 1.0×	305 1.0×	272 1.0×	192 0.9×	135 0.6×	56	1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Caroline Stem

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Caroline Stem's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caroline Stem with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caroline Stem more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Caroline Stem

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caroline Stem. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caroline Stem. The network helps show where Caroline Stem may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Caroline Stem

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Caroline Stem. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Caroline Stem based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Caroline Stem. Caroline Stem is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Salafsky, Nick, Carly N. Cook, Aileen Lee, et al.. (2021). Generic theories of change for conservation strategies: A new series supporting evidence‐based conservation practice. Conservation Science and Practice. 3(6). 6 indexed citations

2.

Margoluis, Richard, et al.. (2013). Results Chains: a Tool for Conservation Action Design, Management, and Evaluation. Ecology and Society. 18(3). 91 indexed citations

3.

Margoluis, Richard, Caroline Stem, Nick Salafsky, & Marcia Brown. (2009). Design alternatives for evaluating the impact of conservation projects. New Directions for Evaluation. 2009(122). 85–96. 106 indexed citations

4.

Margoluis, Richard, Caroline Stem, Nick Salafsky, & Marcia Brown. (2008). Using conceptual models as a planning and evaluation tool in conservation. Evaluation and Program Planning. 32(2). 138–147. 119 indexed citations

5.

Stem, Caroline, Richard Margoluis, Nick Salafsky, & Marcia Brown. (2005). Monitoring and Evaluation in Conservation: a Review of Trends and Approaches. Conservation Biology. 19(2). 295–309. 350 indexed citations

6.

Stem, Caroline, et al.. (2003). How 'Eco' is Ecotourism? A Comparative Case Study of Ecotourism in Costa Rica. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 11(4). 322–347. 113 indexed citations

7.

Stem, Caroline, et al.. (2003). Community Participation in Ecotourism Benefits: The Link to Conservation Practices and Perspectives. Society & Natural Resources. 16(5). 387–413. 218 indexed citations

8.

Stem, Caroline. (2001). The role of local development in protected area management : a comparative case study of eco-tourism in Costa Rica. Bell & Howell Information and Learning eBooks. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact