Caroline King

618 total citations
18 papers, 396 citations indexed

About

Caroline King is a scholar working on Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Caroline King has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 396 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 5 papers in Clinical Psychology and 4 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Caroline King's work include Antibiotic Use and Resistance (6 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (3 papers) and Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (3 papers). Caroline King is often cited by papers focused on Antibiotic Use and Resistance (6 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (3 papers) and Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (3 papers). Caroline King collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Canada. Caroline King's co-authors include Paul Flowers, Kay Currie, Adele Dickson, Fraser Smith, Mark Davis, Lakshmi N.P. Voruganti, Tim Nuttall, Lucyna Gozdzielewska, Lesley Price and D. J. Mellor and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience and Journal of Clinical Nursing.

In The Last Decade

Caroline King

18 papers receiving 388 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Caroline King United Kingdom 10 124 71 61 61 51 18 396
Eleni Antoniadou Greece 13 69 0.6× 45 0.6× 44 0.7× 66 1.1× 15 0.3× 30 542
Kirsten E. Bailey Australia 15 165 1.3× 160 2.3× 60 1.0× 51 0.8× 42 0.8× 30 620
Sarah P. Farrell United States 10 110 0.9× 19 0.3× 16 0.3× 52 0.9× 15 0.3× 25 395
Sian Price United Kingdom 8 56 0.5× 52 0.7× 47 0.8× 34 0.6× 18 0.4× 13 407
Bryan J. Williams United States 15 24 0.2× 22 0.3× 23 0.4× 111 1.8× 98 1.9× 37 1.1k
Gwen Rees United Kingdom 13 32 0.3× 32 0.5× 12 0.2× 38 0.6× 23 0.5× 34 504
Xiangqun Mao United States 9 36 0.3× 20 0.3× 6 0.1× 43 0.7× 29 0.6× 12 468
Lucelly López Colombia 12 64 0.5× 31 0.4× 8 0.1× 21 0.3× 15 0.3× 61 666
Kathy Aureden United States 8 109 0.9× 107 1.5× 29 0.5× 69 1.1× 78 1.5× 10 411
Claudia Hübner Germany 16 38 0.3× 34 0.5× 5 0.1× 109 1.8× 33 0.6× 40 874

Countries citing papers authored by Caroline King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Caroline King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caroline King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caroline King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Caroline King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caroline King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caroline King. The network helps show where Caroline King may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Caroline King

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Caroline King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Caroline King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Caroline King. Caroline King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
King, Caroline, et al.. (2022). Safety of deep brain stimulation in pregnancy: A comprehensive review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 16. 997552–997552. 5 indexed citations
2.
Nichols, David S., et al.. (2021). Pediatric upper extremity firearm injuries: an analysis of demographic factors and recurring mechanisms of injury. World Journal of Pediatrics. 17(5). 527–535. 2 indexed citations
3.
Chandler, Amy, Caroline King, Christopher Burton, & Steve Platt. (2020). The social life of self-harm in general practice. Social Theory & Health. 18(3). 240–256. 6 indexed citations
4.
Gozdzielewska, Lucyna, et al.. (2020). Scoping review of approaches for improving antimicrobial stewardship in livestock farmers and veterinarians. Preventive Veterinary Medicine. 180. 105025–105025. 39 indexed citations
5.
Macduff, Colin, Anne Marie Rafferty, Kay Currie, et al.. (2020). Fostering nursing innovation to prevent and control antimicrobial resistance using approaches from the arts and humanities. Journal of research in nursing. 25(3). 189–207. 4 indexed citations
6.
King, Caroline, et al.. (2019). Injury patterns associated with personal mobility devices and electric bicycles: an analysis from an acute general hospital in Singapore. Singapore Medical Journal. 61(2). 96–101. 28 indexed citations
7.
Dickson, Adele, Fraser Smith, Caroline King, et al.. (2019). Understanding the relationship between pet owners and their companion animals as a key context for antimicrobial resistance-related behaviours: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7(1). 45–61. 33 indexed citations
8.
King, Caroline, Tracyanne Grandison, Julie Cawthorne, & Kay Currie. (2019). Patient experience of hospital screening for carbapenemase‐producing Enterobacteriaceae: A qualitative study. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 28(21-22). 3890–3900. 5 indexed citations
9.
Currie, Kay, Caroline King, Kareena McAloney‐Kocaman, et al.. (2018). The acceptability of screening for Carbapenemase Producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE): cross-sectional survey of nursing staff and the general publics’ perceptions. Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control. 7(1). 144–144. 9 indexed citations
10.
King, Caroline, Mark Davis, Adele Dickson, et al.. (2018). Pet owner and vet interactions: exploring the drivers of AMR. Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control. 7(1). 46–46. 71 indexed citations
11.
Currie, Kay, Sally Stewart, Caroline King, et al.. (2018). Understanding the patient experience of health care–associated infection: A qualitative systematic review. American Journal of Infection Control. 46(8). 936–942. 20 indexed citations
12.
Currie, Kay, et al.. (2018). Expert consensus regarding drivers of antimicrobial stewardship in companion animal veterinary practice: a Delphi study. Veterinary Record. 182(24). 691–691. 36 indexed citations
13.
King, Caroline, Kay Currie, Adele Dickson, et al.. (2018). Exploring the behavioural drivers of veterinary surgeon antibiotic prescribing: a qualitative study of companion animal veterinary surgeons in the UK. BMC Veterinary Research. 14(1). 332–332. 47 indexed citations
15.
King, Caroline. (2016). ‘It depends what you class as vulnerable’: risk discourse and the framing of vulnerability in health visiting policy and practice. Families Relationships and Societies. 7(1). 39–54. 3 indexed citations
16.
King, Caroline. (2016). ‘Sticking to carpets’ – assessment and judgement in health visiting practice in an era of risk: a qualitative study. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 25(13-14). 1901–1911. 2 indexed citations
17.
Chandler, Amy, Caroline King, Christopher Burton, & Stephen Platt. (2015). General Practitioners’ Accounts of Patients Who Have Self-Harmed. Crisis. 37(1). 42–50. 19 indexed citations
18.
King, Caroline & Lakshmi N.P. Voruganti. (2002). What’s in a name? The evolution of the nomenclature of antipsychotic drugs. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience. 27(3). 168–175. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026