Mark Davis

149 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Mark Davis's Hit Papers

What is Narrative Research? 2014 · 156 citations
1560+4+8Years since publication50100150

Peers

Mark Davis
Comparison fields: 5 of 181
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 352
  • Infectious Diseases 1.2k
  • General Health Professions 768
  • Clinical Psychology 649
  • Gender Studies 289
Replace Paul Flowers with:
Paul Flowers United Kingdom
Nai‐Ying Ko Taiwan
Joseph Tucker United States
Rachel A. Smith United States
John C. Heritage United States
Linda Kaljee United States
Hillard Weinstock United States
Jane Simone Hocking Australia
Jeffrey David Klausner United States
James D. Campbell United States
Mark Davis relative to Paul Flowers United Kingdom Paul Flowers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Paul Flowers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Davis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Davis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Davis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Davis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Davis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Davis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Davis. The network helps show where Mark Davis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Davis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Davis Line = papers co-authored together Mark Davis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 161 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993256
2 2005189
3
What is Narrative Research?
Hit paper breakdown →
2014156
4 2004140
5 2007123
6 2004112
7 2006104
8 2004103
9 2018102
10 200597
11 199996
12 201893
13 201882
14 200480
15 201069
16 200266
17 201465
18 201661
19 201759
20 200455

About Mark Davis

Mark Davis is a scholar working on Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Infectious Diseases, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Clinical Psychology, having authored 161 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (31 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (20 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (16 papers), Sex work and related issues (14 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (11 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (10 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (9 papers) and Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (352 citations), Infectious Diseases (1.2k citations), General Health Professions (768 citations), Clinical Psychology (649 citations) and Gender Studies (289 citations). Mark Davis has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul Flowers, Graham J. Hart, Lorraine Sherr, Jonathan Elford, Graham Bolding, Gary W. Dowsett, Tim Rhodes, Peter Karl Jonason, Niamh Stephenson and Susan C. Kippax. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Health Risk & Society, Sociology of Health & Illness, Culture Health & Sexuality and Psychology and Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact