Caroline Bills

423 total citations
7 papers, 293 citations indexed

About

Caroline Bills is a scholar working on Rheumatology, Surgery and Pharmacology. According to data from OpenAlex, Caroline Bills has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 293 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Rheumatology, 4 papers in Surgery and 4 papers in Pharmacology. Recurrent topics in Caroline Bills's work include Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (6 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers) and Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (2 papers). Caroline Bills is often cited by papers focused on Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (6 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers) and Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (2 papers). Caroline Bills collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Serbia and India. Caroline Bills's co-authors include Janette Gale, Rana S. Hinman, Kim L. Bennell, Anthony Harris, Andrew Forbes, Stephen Bunker, Penny K. Campbell, Jessica Kasza, Belinda J. Lawford and David J. Hunter and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal of Sports Medicine, Physical Therapy and Osteoarthritis and Cartilage.

In The Last Decade

Caroline Bills

7 papers receiving 291 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Caroline Bills Australia 6 145 97 84 64 57 7 293
Theo John Pimm United Kingdom 6 152 1.0× 113 1.2× 136 1.6× 58 0.9× 33 0.6× 7 365
Laurianne Loew Canada 10 117 0.8× 89 0.9× 69 0.8× 82 1.3× 116 2.0× 12 360
J.L. Stiller United States 5 78 0.5× 91 0.9× 62 0.7× 39 0.6× 43 0.8× 5 276
Ulrika Öberg Sweden 11 52 0.4× 79 0.8× 59 0.7× 96 1.5× 42 0.7× 22 374
Alexander J. Kimp Australia 14 219 1.5× 286 2.9× 100 1.2× 74 1.2× 58 1.0× 26 545
Tuva Moseng Norway 9 114 0.8× 84 0.9× 96 1.1× 47 0.7× 42 0.7× 21 336
S.P. Messier United States 6 181 1.2× 130 1.3× 85 1.0× 16 0.3× 51 0.9× 9 432
Robert Burns United States 2 208 1.4× 129 1.3× 81 1.0× 34 0.5× 25 0.4× 2 419
Anthony J. Goff Singapore 9 116 0.8× 96 1.0× 53 0.6× 49 0.8× 32 0.6× 16 242
Carolyn Page Australia 9 121 0.8× 105 1.1× 59 0.7× 40 0.6× 24 0.4× 14 277

Countries citing papers authored by Caroline Bills

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Caroline Bills's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caroline Bills with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caroline Bills more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Caroline Bills

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caroline Bills. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caroline Bills. The network helps show where Caroline Bills may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Caroline Bills

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Caroline Bills. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Caroline Bills based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Caroline Bills. Caroline Bills is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
1.
Hinman, Rana S., Penny K. Campbell, Belinda J. Lawford, et al.. (2019). Does telephone-delivered exercise advice and support by physiotherapists improve pain and/or function in people with knee osteoarthritis? Telecare randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 54(13). 790–797. 89 indexed citations
2.
Lawford, Belinda J., Kim L. Bennell, Jessica Kasza, et al.. (2019). Implementation of person‐centred practice principles and behaviour change techniques after a 2‐day training workshop: A nested case study involving physiotherapists. Musculoskeletal Care. 17(2). 221–233. 9 indexed citations
3.
Hinman, Rana S., Belinda J. Lawford, Penny K. Campbell, et al.. (2017). Telephone-Delivered Exercise Advice and Behavior Change Support by Physical Therapists for People with Knee Osteoarthritis: Protocol for the Telecare Randomized Controlled Trial. Physical Therapy. 97(5). 524–536. 23 indexed citations
4.
Lawford, Belinda J., Clare Delany, Kim L. Bennell, et al.. (2017). Training Physical Therapists in Person‐Centered Practice for People With Osteoarthritis: A Qualitative Case Study. Arthritis Care & Research. 70(4). 558–570. 29 indexed citations
5.
Bennell, Kim L., Penny K. Campbell, Thorlene Egerton, et al.. (2016). Telephone coaching to enhance a physiotherapist-prescribed home-based physical activity program for knee osteoarthritis: A randomised clinical trial. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 24. S44–S45. 5 indexed citations
6.
Bennell, Kim L., Penny K. Campbell, Thorlene Egerton, et al.. (2016). Telephone Coaching to Enhance a Home‐Based Physical Activity Program for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Arthritis Care & Research. 69(1). 84–94. 106 indexed citations
7.
Bennell, Kim L., Thorlene Egerton, Caroline Bills, et al.. (2012). Addition of telephone coaching to a physiotherapist-delivered physical activity program in people with knee osteoarthritis: A randomised controlled trial protocol. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 13(1). 246–246. 32 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026