Carolien De Keyzer
About
In The Last Decade
Carolien De Keyzer
2 papers receiving 21 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 18
- Infectious Diseases 13
- Molecular Biology 8
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 7
- Insect Science 3
- Neurology 2
Countries citing papers authored by Carolien De Keyzer
This map shows the geographic impact of Carolien De Keyzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carolien De Keyzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carolien De Keyzer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Carolien De Keyzer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carolien De Keyzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carolien De Keyzer. The network helps show where Carolien De Keyzer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Carolien De Keyzer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Carolien De Keyzer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Carolien De Keyzer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Carolien De Keyzer. Carolien De Keyzer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | 9 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.